Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35667328›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2022

An automated near-real time computational method for induction and treatment of scar-related ventricular tachycardias.

Fernando O Campos, Aurel Neic, Caroline Mendonca Costa, John Whitaker, Mark O'Neill, Reza Razavi, Christopher A Rinaldi, DanielScherr, Steven A Niederer, Gernot Plank and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computer-aided characterization of the arrhythmogenic substrate after myocardial infarction.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Stochastic virtual heart model predictions.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025
    Article
  8. From bits to bedside: entering the age of digital twins in cardiac electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Arrhythmogenic vulnerability of re-entrant pathways in post-infarct ventricular tachycardia assessed by advanced computational modelling.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fernando O CamposSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: fernando.campos@kcl.ac.uk.
Aurel NeicNumeriCor GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Caroline Mendonca CostaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
John WhitakerSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Cardiovascular Directorate.
Mark O'NeillSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Cardiovascular Directorate.
Reza RazaviSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher A RinaldiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Cardiovascular Directorate.
DanielScherrDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Steven A NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gernot PlankGottfried Schatz Research Center Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin J BishopSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 2760British Heart Foundation PG/16/81/32441British Heart Foundation PG/22/10871Medical Research Council MR/N011007/1Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 213342/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter ablation is currently the only curative treatment for scar-related ventricular tachycardias (VTs). However, not only are ablation procedures long, with relatively high risk, but success rates are punitively low, with frequent VT recurrence. Personalized in-silico approaches have the opportunity to address these limitations. However, state-of-the-art reaction diffusion (R-D) simulations of VT induction and subsequent circuits used for in-silico ablation target identification require long execution times, along with vast computational resources, which are incompatible with the clinical workflow. Here, we present the Virtual Induction and Treatment of Arrhythmias (VITA), a novel, rapid and fully automated computational approach that uses reaction-Eikonal methodology to induce VT and identify subsequent ablation targets. The rationale for VITA is based on finding isosurfaces associated with an activation wavefront that splits in the ventricles due to the presence of an isolated isthmus of conduction within the scar; once identified, each isthmus may be assessed for their vulnerability to sustain a reentrant circuit, and the corresponding exit site automatically identified for potential ablation targeting. VITA was tested on a virtual cohort of 7 post-infarcted porcine hearts and the results compared to R-D simulations. Using only a standard desktop machine, VITA could detect all scar-related VTs, simulating activation time maps and ECGs (for clinical comparison) as well as computing ablation targets in 48 minutes. The comparable VTs probed by the R-D simulations took 68.5 hours on 256 cores of high-performance computing infrastructure. The set of lesions computed by VITA was shown to render the ventricular model VT-free. VITA could be used in near real-time as a complementary modality aiding in clinical decision-making in the treatment of post-infarction VTs.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationMyocardial InfarctionTachycardia, VentricularAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacCicatrixElectrocardiographyHumansSwineCatheter ablationComputational modelingMyocardial infarctionVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID35667328
PMCPMC10114098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.