Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666987›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Gestational age, birth weight, and perinatal complications in mothers with diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: Japan Environment and Children's Study cohort.

Hiroshi Yokomichi, Mie Mochizuki, Ryoji Shinohara, Megumi Kushima, Sayaka Horiuchi, Reiji Kojima, Tadao Ooka, Yuka Akiyama, Kunio Miyake, Sanae Otawa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Nursing Intervention on Children with Type 2 Diabetes.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi YokomichiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-155X
Mie MochizukiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5748-7388
Ryoji ShinoharaCentre for Birth Cohort Studies, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Megumi KushimaCentre for Birth Cohort Studies, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Sayaka HoriuchiCentre for Birth Cohort Studies, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Reiji KojimaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Tadao OokaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yuka AkiyamaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Kunio MiyakeDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Sanae OtawaCentre for Birth Cohort Studies, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Zentaro YamagataDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group
University of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to determine the risk of perinatal complications during delivery in mothers with non-normal glucose tolerance in a large Japanese birth cohort. We analysed data of 24,295 neonate-mother pairs in the Japan Environment and Children's Study cohort between 2011 and 2014. We included 67 mothers with type 1 diabetes, 102 with type 2 diabetes (determined by questionnaire), 2,045 with gestational diabetes (determined by diagnosis), and 2,949 with plasma glucose levels ≥140 mg/dL (shown by a screening test for gestational diabetes). Gestational age, birth weight, placental weight, and proportions of preterm birth, and labour and neonatal complications at delivery in mothers with diabetes were compared with those in mothers with normal glucose tolerance. Mean gestational age was shorter in mothers with any type of diabetes than in mothers without diabetes. Birth weight tended to be heavier in mothers with type 1 diabetes, and placental weight was significantly heavier in mothers with type 1 and gestational diabetes and elevated plasma glucose levels (all p<0.05). The relative risks of any labour complication and any neonatal complication were 1.49 and 2.28 in type 2 diabetes, 1.59 and 1.95 in gestational diabetes, and 1.22 and 1.30 in a positive screening test result (all p<0.05). The relative risks of preterm birth, gestational hypertension, and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in mothers with types 1 (2.77; 4.07; 2.04) and 2 diabetes (2.65; 5.84; 1.99) and a positive screening test result (1.29; 1.63; 1.12) than in those without diabetes (all p<0.05). In conclusion, placental weight is heavier in mothers with non-normal glucose tolerance. Preterm birth, gestational hypertension, and jaundice are more frequent in mothers with types 1 and 2 diabetes. A positive result in a screening test for gestational diabetes suggests not only a non-normal glucose tolerance, but also a medium (middle-level) risk of perinatal complications.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucose IntoleranceHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPremature BirthBirth WeightBlood GlucoseChildFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornJapanPlacentaPregnancyBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID35666987
PMCPMC9170270
OpenAlexW4285685583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.