Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666848›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2022

Multimodal nocturnal seizure detection: Do we need to adapt algorithms for children?

Richard H C Lazeron, Roland D Thijs, Johan Arends, Thea Gutter, Pierre Cluitmans, Johannes Van Dijk, Francis I Y Tan, Wytske Hofstra, Claire E H M Donjacour, Frans Leijten and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Holistic management of epilepsy in adults with intellectual development disorders.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seizure Detection Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard H C LazeronKempenhaeghe ACE, Heeze, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5570-8872
Roland D ThijsSEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Johan ArendsKempenhaeghe ACE, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Thea GutterSEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Pierre CluitmansKempenhaeghe ACE, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Johannes Van DijkKempenhaeghe ACE, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Francis I Y TanKempenhaeghe ACE, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Wytske HofstraSEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Claire E H M DonjacourSEIN, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Frans LeijtenUMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2603-3364
Dutch Tele-Epilepsy Consortium
Kempenhaeghe · NLStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the performance of a multimodal seizure detection device, first tested in adults (sensitivity 86%, PPV 49%), in a pediatric cohort living at home or residential care.

methodsIn this multicenter, prospective, video-controlled cohort-study, nocturnal seizures were detected by heartrate and movement changes in children with epilepsy and intellectual disability. Participants with a history of >1 monthly major motor seizure wore Nightwatch bracelet at night for 3 months. Major seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, generalized tonic >30 s, hyperkinetic, or clusters (>30 min) of short myoclonic or tonic seizures. The video of all events (alarms and nurse diaries) and about 10% of whole nights were reviewed to classify major seizures, and minor or no seizures.

resultsTwenty-three participants with focal or generalized epilepsy and nightly motor seizures were evaluated during 1511 nights, with 1710 major seizures. First 1014 nights, 4189 alarms occurred with average of 1.44/h, showing average sensitivity of 79.9% (median 75.4%) with mean PPV of 26.7% (median 11.1%) and false alarm rate of 0.2/hour. Over 90% of false alarms in children was due to heart rate (HR) part of the detection algorithm. To improve this rate, an adaptation was made such that the alarm was only triggered when the wearer was in horizontal position. For the remaining 497 nights, this was tested prospectively, 384 major seizures occurred. This resulted in mean PPV of 55.5% (median 58.1%) and a false alarm rate 0.08/h while maintaining a comparable mean sensitivity of 79.4% (median 93.2%). SIGNIFICANCE: Seizure detection devices that are used in bed which depend on heartrate and movement show similar sensitivity in children and adults. However, children do show general higher false alarm rate, mostly triggered while awake. By correcting for body position, the false alarms can be limited to a level that comes close to that in adults.

Indexed as

EpilepsyEpilepsy, Tonic-ClonicAdultAlgorithmsChildElectroencephalographyHumansProspective StudiesSeizuresnightlyNightwatchnocturnalseizureseizure detectionseizure detection epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID35666848
PMCPMC9436288
OpenAlexW4282011997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.