Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666737›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Evaluation of quantitative accuracy among different scatter corrections for quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging.

Kenta Miwa, Reo Nemoto, Hirotsugu Masuko, Tensho Yamao, Rinya Kobayashi, Noriaki Miyaji, Kosuke Inoue, Hiroya Onodera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Inter-institutional variability in kidney dosimetry duringRadiological physics and technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Influence of spill-over forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenta MiwaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-0180
Reo NemotoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan.
Hirotsugu MasukoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan.
Tensho YamaoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Rinya KobayashiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan.
Noriaki MiyajiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke InoueDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan.
Hiroya OnoderaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan.
International University of Health and Welfare · JPFukushima Medical University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although scatter correction improves SPECT image contrast and thus image quality, the effects of quantitation accuracy under various conditions remain unclear. The present study aimed to empirically define the conditions for the optimal scatter correction of quantitative bone SPECT/CT images. Scatter correction was performed by applying dual and triple energy windows (DEW and TEW) with different sub-energy window widths, and effective scatter source estimation (ESSE) to CT-based scatter correction. Scattered radiation was corrected on images acquired using a triple line source (TLSP) phantom and an uniform cylinder phantom. The TLSP consisted of a line source containing 74.0 MBq of 99mTc in the middle, and a background component containing air, water or a K2HPO4 solution with a density equivalent to that of bone. The sum of all pixels in air, water and the K2HPO4 solution was measured on SPECT images. Scatter fraction (SF) and normalized mean square error (NMSE) based on counts from the air background as a reference were then calculated to assess quantitative errors due to scatter correction. The uniform cylinder phantom contained the same K2HPO4 solution and 222.0 MBq of 99mTc. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated from the count profile of this phantom to assess the uniformity of SPECT images across scatter correction under various conditions. Both SF and NMSE in SPECT images of phantoms containing water in the background were lower at a TEW sub-window of 3% (TEW3%), than in other scatter corrections, whereas those in K2HPO4 were lower at a DEW sub-window of 20% (DEW20%). Larger DEW and smaller TEW sub-energy windows allowed more effective correction. The CV of the uniform cylinder phantom, DEW20%, was inferior to all other tested scatter corrections. The quantitative accuracy of bone SPECT images substantially differed according to the method of scatter correction. The optimal scatter correction for quantitative bone SPECT was DEW20% (k = 1), but at the cost of slightly decreased image uniformity.

Indexed as

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonPhantoms, ImagingScattering, RadiationWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID35666737
PMCPMC9170091
OpenAlexW4285610993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.