Trial reportJAMA neurology2022
Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the RESCUEicp Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy and neurological recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Does the implementation of a trauma system affect injury-related morbidity and economic outcomes? A systematic review.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2024Pooled it
- Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for patients undergoing surgical evacuation of an acute subdural hematoma: RESCUE-ASDH RCT and cost effectiveness.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Trial
- Long-term functional outcomes following pediatric decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Five-Year Follow-Up of Work Disability After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide Swedish Matched Cohort Study of 98,000 Individuals.Neurology · 2026Article
- To Do or Not to Do: Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: insights from a 15-year multicentre cohort in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting secondary decompressive craniectomy in TBI patients after emergent craniotomy with bone flap replacement.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy size in traumatic brain injury; an international, observational, comparative effectiveness study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- A systematic review of mortality and long-term functional outcomes after decompressive craniectomy for acquired brain injury: The missing rehabilitation reporting.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Review
- Collapse Ratio and Operative Duration as Key Predictors of Postoperative Complications Following Cranioplasty.Cureus · 2025Article
- Perceiving traumatic brain injury from glymphatic system.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Review
- Evolution from Decompressive Craniectomy to Early Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Refractory Increased Intracranial Pressure Treatment: Merit or Social Problems?Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Practical and theoretical perspectives on early decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Authors' reply.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- A personalized 3D printed cranial shield using mirror-image modeling: design and clinical assessment.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Frailty on Functional Outcome in Neurointensive Care Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Decompressive craniectomy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: can favorable outcome be achieved?Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Decompressive craniectomy in subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to other etiologies: An institutional experience of 11 years.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: a review of recent landmark trials.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
- Skull defect - Frontotemporal dementia sagging brain syndrome.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Trials often assess primary outcomes of traumatic brain injury at 6 months. Longer-term data are needed to assess outcomes for patients receiving surgical vs medical treatment for traumatic intracranial hypertension. Objective: To evaluate 24-month outcomes for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension treated with decompressive craniectomy or standard medical care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Surgery With Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of Intracranial Pressure (RESCUEicp) randomized clinical trial data was performed for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension (>25 mm Hg) from 52 centers in 20 countries. Enrollment occurred between January 2004 and March 2014. Data were analyzed between 2018 and 2021. Eligibility criteria were age 10 to 65 years, traumatic brain injury (confirmed via computed tomography), intracranial pressure monitoring, and sustained and refractory elevated intracranial pressure for 1 to 12 hours despite pressure-controlling measures. Exclusion criteria were bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis, or unsurvivable injury. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a decompressive craniectomy with standard care (surgical group) or to ongoing medical treatment with the option to add barbiturate infusion (medical group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was measured with the 8-point Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (1 indicates death and 8 denotes upper good recovery), and the 6- to 24-month outcome trajectory was examined. Results: This study enrolled 408 patients: 206 in the surgical group and 202 in the medical group. The mean (SD) age was 32.3 (13.2) and 34.8 (13.7) years, respectively, and the study population was predominantly male (165 [81.7%] and 156 [80.0%], respectively). At 24 months, patients in the surgical group had reduced mortality (61 [33.5%] vs 94 [54.0%]; absolute difference, -20.5 [95% CI, -30.8 to -10.2]) and higher rates of vegetative state (absolute difference, 4.3 [95% CI, 0.0 to 8.6]), lower or upper moderate disability (4.7 [-0.9 to 10.3] vs 2.8 [-4.2 to 9.8]), and lower or upper severe disability (2.2 [-5.4 to 9.8] vs 6.5 [1.8 to 11.2]; χ27 = 24.20, P = .001). For every 100 individuals treated surgically, 21 additional patients survived at 24 months; 4 were in a vegetative state, 2 had lower and 7 had upper severe disability, and 5 had lower and 3 had upper moderate disability, respectively. Rates of lower and upper good recovery were similar for the surgical and medical groups (20 [11.0%] vs 19 [10.9%]), and significant differences in net improvement (≥1 grade) were observed between 6 and 24 months (55 [30.0%] vs 25 [14.0%]; χ22 = 13.27, P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: At 24 months, patients with surgically treated posttraumatic refractory intracranial hypertension had a sustained reduction in mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, severe disability, and moderate disability. Patients in the surgical group were more likely to improve over time vs patients in the medical group. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Identifier: 66202560.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.