Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666526›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2022

Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the RESCUEicp Randomized Clinical Trial.

Angelos G Kolias, Hadie Adams, Ivan S Timofeev, Elizabeth A Corteen, Iftakher Hossain, Marek Czosnyka, Jake Timothy, Ian Anderson, Diederik O Bulters, Antonio Belli and 17 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Long-term functional outcomes following pediatric decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: insights from a 15-year multicentre cohort in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Skull defect - Frontotemporal dementia sagging brain syndrome.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

Angelos G KoliasDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hadie AdamsDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ivan S TimofeevDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth A CorteenDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Iftakher HossainDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marek CzosnykaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jake TimothyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Ian AndersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Diederik O BultersUniversity Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Antonio BelliUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
C Andrew EynonUniversity Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
John WadleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
A David MendelowNeurosurgical Trials Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Patrick M MitchellNeurosurgical Trials Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Mark H WilsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Imperial Neurotrauma Centre, Imperial College Academic Health Sciences Centre, St Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Giles CritchleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Juan SahuquilloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andreas UnterbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jussi P PostiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Injury Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Franco ServadeiDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Graham M TeasdaleDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
John D PickardDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David K MenonDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gordon D MurrayDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Peter J KirkpatrickDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter J HutchinsonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
RESCUEicp Trial Collaborators
University of Cambridge · GBNewcastle University · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBHeidelberg University · DEHumanitas University · ITRoyal London Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council 09/800/16Medical Research Council G0001237Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G0601025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Trials often assess primary outcomes of traumatic brain injury at 6 months. Longer-term data are needed to assess outcomes for patients receiving surgical vs medical treatment for traumatic intracranial hypertension. Objective: To evaluate 24-month outcomes for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension treated with decompressive craniectomy or standard medical care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Surgery With Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of Intracranial Pressure (RESCUEicp) randomized clinical trial data was performed for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension (>25 mm Hg) from 52 centers in 20 countries. Enrollment occurred between January 2004 and March 2014. Data were analyzed between 2018 and 2021. Eligibility criteria were age 10 to 65 years, traumatic brain injury (confirmed via computed tomography), intracranial pressure monitoring, and sustained and refractory elevated intracranial pressure for 1 to 12 hours despite pressure-controlling measures. Exclusion criteria were bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis, or unsurvivable injury. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a decompressive craniectomy with standard care (surgical group) or to ongoing medical treatment with the option to add barbiturate infusion (medical group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was measured with the 8-point Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (1 indicates death and 8 denotes upper good recovery), and the 6- to 24-month outcome trajectory was examined. Results: This study enrolled 408 patients: 206 in the surgical group and 202 in the medical group. The mean (SD) age was 32.3 (13.2) and 34.8 (13.7) years, respectively, and the study population was predominantly male (165 [81.7%] and 156 [80.0%], respectively). At 24 months, patients in the surgical group had reduced mortality (61 [33.5%] vs 94 [54.0%]; absolute difference, -20.5 [95% CI, -30.8 to -10.2]) and higher rates of vegetative state (absolute difference, 4.3 [95% CI, 0.0 to 8.6]), lower or upper moderate disability (4.7 [-0.9 to 10.3] vs 2.8 [-4.2 to 9.8]), and lower or upper severe disability (2.2 [-5.4 to 9.8] vs 6.5 [1.8 to 11.2]; χ27 = 24.20, P = .001). For every 100 individuals treated surgically, 21 additional patients survived at 24 months; 4 were in a vegetative state, 2 had lower and 7 had upper severe disability, and 5 had lower and 3 had upper moderate disability, respectively. Rates of lower and upper good recovery were similar for the surgical and medical groups (20 [11.0%] vs 19 [10.9%]), and significant differences in net improvement (≥1 grade) were observed between 6 and 24 months (55 [30.0%] vs 25 [14.0%]; χ22 = 13.27, P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: At 24 months, patients with surgically treated posttraumatic refractory intracranial hypertension had a sustained reduction in mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, severe disability, and moderate disability. Patients in the surgical group were more likely to improve over time vs patients in the medical group. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Identifier: 66202560.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticDecompressive CraniectomyIntracranial HypertensionAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersistent Vegetative StateTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35666526
PMCPMC9171657
OpenAlexW4281659733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.