Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666502›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Trends in Cannabis Polysubstance Use During Early Pregnancy Among Patients in a Large Health Care System in Northern California.

Kelly C Young-Wolff, Varada Sarovar, Lue-Yen Tucker, Deborah Ansley, Nancy Goler, Amy Conway, Allison Ettenger, Tara R Foti, Qiana L Brown, Ellen T Kurtzman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in Prenatal Polysubstance Exposure.Families in society : the journal of contemporary human services · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly C Young-WolffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Varada SarovarDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Lue-Yen TuckerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Deborah AnsleyRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Nancy GolerRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Amy ConwayRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Allison EttengerRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Tara R FotiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Qiana L BrownSchool of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
Ellen T KurtzmanSchool of Nursing, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Sara R AdamsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Stacey E AlexeeffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Kaiser Permanente · USGeorge Washington University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Mentoring Emerging Scientists for Careers in Substance Use ResearchR25DA035163 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Carmen L Masson, Gideon St.Helen · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Identifying Risk Factors for Prenatal Substance and Polysubstance UseK01DA043604 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2017 to 2021
$907k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043604NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA035163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Rates of prenatal cannabis use are increasing alongside perceptions that cannabis is a harmless therapeutic for pregnancy-related ailments, while rates of prenatal use of alcohol and tobacco are decreasing. It is important to examine whether cannabis use during pregnancy is increasing similarly among patients with and patients without co-occurring substance use. Objectives: To examine trends in cannabis polysubstance use during pregnancy and to test differences in cannabis use over time among pregnant individuals who use only cannabis vs those who use cannabis and other substances. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional time-series study used data from 367 138 pregnancies among 281 590 unique pregnant patients universally screened for prenatal substance use as part of standard care in Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from October 5, 2021, to April 18, 2022. Exposures: Time (calendar year). Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of substances during early pregnancy was assessed via universal screening with a self-administered questionnaire (for cannabis, alcohol, stimulants, and nicotine) and/or positive results of a urine toxicology test (for cannabis, alcohol, stimulants, and pharmaceutical opioids), and data were extracted from the electronic health record. Results: The study sample of 367 138 pregnancies from 281 590 unique pregnant patients (median gestation at time of screening, 8.6 weeks [IQR, 7.3-10.6 weeks]) was 25.9% Asian or Pacific Islander, 6.6% Black, 25.8% Hispanic, 38.0% non-Hispanic White, and 3.6% other race or ethnicity; 1.1% were aged 11 to 17 years, 14.9% were aged 18 to 24 years, 61.9% were aged 25 to 34 years, and 22.1% were aged 35 years or older; and the median neighborhood household income was $70 455 (IQR, $51 563-$92 625). From 2009 to 2018, adjusted rates of use of only cannabis during pregnancy (no other substances) increased substantially from 2.39% (95% CI, 2.20%-2.58%) in 2009 to 6.30% (95% CI, 6.00%-6.60%) in 2018, increasing at an annual relative rate of 1.11 (95% CI, 1.10-1.12). The rate of use of cannabis and 1 other substance also increased (annual relative rate, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.05]), but not as rapidly (P < .001 for difference), while the rate of use of cannabis and 2 or more other substances decreased slightly (annual relative rate, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]). Adjusted rates of prenatal use of cannabis and alcohol (1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.06]) and cannabis and stimulants (1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]) increased over time, while rates of prenatal use of cannabis and nicotine (0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.98]) decreased. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional time-series study, rates of prenatal cannabis use during early pregnancy increased significantly more rapidly among patients without co-occurring substance use, which could reflect increased acceptability of cannabis and decreased perceptions of cannabis-related harms. Furthermore, increased rates of use of cannabis with alcohol and stimulants warrant continued monitoring.

Indexed as

CannabisHallucinogensSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesicsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEthanolFemaleHumansNicotinePregnancyAnalgesicsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsEthanolHallucinogensNicotine

Identifiers

PMID35666502
PMCPMC9171564
OpenAlexW4282941655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.