ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Quantitative Assessment of Biomechanical Properties of the Human Keratoconus Cornea Using Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring airway compliance of pulmonary fibrosis by endobronchial optical coherence elastography.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Novel Approach to Fabricate Early Keratoconus Phantom Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of corneal biomechanical changes in vivo after photorefractive intrastromal corneal cross-linking using optical coherence elastography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics Following Cross-Linking Surgeries Using Optical Coherence Elastography in a Rabbit Model of Keratoconus.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Quantification of biomechanical properties of keratoconus (KC) corneas has great significance for early diagnosis and treatment of KC, but the corresponding clinical measurement remains challenging. Here, we developed an acoustic radiation force (ARF) optical coherence elastography technique and explored its potential for evaluating biomechanical properties of KC corneas. Methods: An ARF system was used to induce the tissue deformation, which was detected by an optical coherence tomography system, and thus the localized point-by-point Young's modulus measurements were achieved. Then, two healthy rabbit eyes were imaged to test the system, after which the human keratoconus cornea was evaluated by using the same method. Three regions were selected for biomechanics analysis: the conical region, the transitional region, and the peripheral region. Results: Young's moduli of transitional region ranged from 53.3 to 58.5 kPa. The corresponding values for the peripheral region were determined to be 58.6 kPa and 63.2 kPa, respectively. Young's moduli of the conical region were gradually increased by 18.3% from the center to the periphery, resulting in the minimum and maximum values of 44.9 kPa and 53.1 kPa, respectively. Furthermore, Young's moduli of the anterior and posterior of the center were determined to be 44.9 kPa and 50.7 kPa, respectively. Conclusions: Differences in biomechanical properties between the three regions and slight variations within the conical region were clearly distinguished. Biomechanical weakening of the keratoconus cornea was mainly localized in the conical region, especially in the vertex position. Translational Relevance: The system may provide a promising clinical tool for the noninvasive evaluation of local corneal biomechanics and thus may have potential applications in early keratoconus detection with further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.