Observational studyEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2022
Prediction of bowel management independence after ischemic spinal cord injury.
Observational study in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01571531 (European Multicentre Study of Human SCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
European Multicentre Study of Human SCI
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linking neurological status to functional outcomes in spinal cord injury: a multi-class, task-specific approach.BMC biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis use in the field of spinal cord injury research: A bibliometric analysis.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Prediction of early bladder outcomes after spinal cord injury: The HALT score.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Prediction of Lower Urinary Tract, Sexual, and Bowel Function, and Autonomic Dysreflexia after Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIschemic spinal cord injury (SCI) belongs to the heterogeneous group of non-traumatic SCI, while the course of sensorimotor and functional recovery is comparable to traumatic SCI. Recently, we derived from data of patients with traumatic SCI a valid model to predict an independent and reliable bowel management one year after SCI.
aimTo evaluate the performance of this model to predict an independent and reliable bowel management one year following ischemic SCI.
designPrognostic study - observational study.
settingEuropean Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01571531. POPULATION: One hundred and forty-two patients with ischemic SCI of various level and severity of injury.
methodsThe prediction model relied on a single predictor collected within 40 days from injury, the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury total motor score. Bowel outcome one year after SCI derived from the dichotomization of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) item 7 scores. We defined a positive outcome as independent bowel management with regular movements and appropriate timing with no or rare accidents (score of 10 in SCIM version II and score of 8 or 10 in version III).
resultsThe model showed a fair discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.780 (95% confidence interval=0.702-0.860). In addition, the model displayed an acceptable accuracy and calibration.
conclusionsThe study extends the validity of our rule to patients with ischemic SCI, thus providing the first model to predict an independent and reliable bowel management in this population. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The model may be employed in clinical practice to counsel patients, to define the rehabilitation aims and to estimate the need of assistance after discharge, as well as in the research field for the optimization of patients' allocation in the design of future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.