Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666462›Full record

ArticleHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2022

Let's Play at Digging : How Vigorous Is This Energetic Task for a Young Forager?

Ana Mateos, Guillermo Zorrilla-Revilla, Jesús Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana MateosNational Research Center On Human Evolution (CENIEH), 09002, Burgos, Spain. ana.mateos@cenieh.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0676-9836
Guillermo Zorrilla-RevillaNational Research Center On Human Evolution (CENIEH), 09002, Burgos, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-1848
Jesús RodríguezNational Research Center On Human Evolution (CENIEH), 09002, Burgos, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-0694

Funding

Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León EDU/602/2016Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MICINN PID2019-105101GB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extractive foraging tasks, such as digging, are broadly practiced among hunter-gatherer populations in different ecological conditions. Despite tuber-gathering tasks being widely practiced by children and adolescents, little research has focused on the physical traits associated with digging ability. Here, we assess how age and energetic expenditure affect the performance of this extractive task. Using an experimental approach, the energetic cost of digging to extract simulated tubers is evaluated in a sample of 40 urban children and adolescents of both sexes to measure the intensity of the physical effort and the influence of several anatomical variables. Digging is a moderately vigorous activity for inexperienced girls and boys from 8 to 14 years old, and it requires significant physical effort depending on strength and body size. However, extracting subterranean resources is a task that may be performed effectively without previous training. Sex-specific and age-specific differences in the net energy expenditure of digging were detected, even though both sexes exhibited similar proficiency levels when performing the task. Our results highlight that both boys and girls spend considerable energy while digging, with differences largely driven by body size and age. Other factors beyond ability and experience, such as strength and body size, may influence the proficiency of juveniles in performing certain physically intensive foraging tasks, such as gathering tubers.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismPhysical FitnessAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionAdolescenceChildhoodDiggingEnergeticsForaging

Identifiers

PMID35666462
PMCPMC9250475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.