ArticlePediatric surgery international2022
Should the processus vaginalis sac be opened or closed in pediatric herniotomy? A two-center cohort study.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of ligamentum teres uteri preservation in laparoscopic high hernia sac ligation in children with indirect inguinal hernia.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations in children. To improve outcome, several techniques are used. However, it has not been established if the open or the closed hernia sac preparation technique is superior in (premature) neonates and older children.
methodsRetrospective study including all cases of inguinal hernia repair in children at two large centers. Demographic data and outcome parameters including procedure time and intra as well as postoperative complications were evaluated. To compare open vs. closed hernia sack preparation, cases with secondary open preparation were excluded and propensity score matching was performed. Regression analysis was used to determine factors affecting operative time and recurrence rate.
resultsIn total 2476 cases of inguinal hernia repair were identified. After exclusion of direct hernias as well as revision cases, 2257 cases were analyzed. Overall mean operative time was 25.8 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 0.1% and. postoperative complications occurred in 3.0% of all cases, the most frequent postoperative complication being recurrence (1.7%). Closed preparation technique resulted in significantly faster procedure time and lower recurrence rates in premature neonates and older children compared to the open hernia sac preparation technique. Operative technique, prematurity, gender and training of the surgeon are highly associated with operative time, whereas operative technique is the main factor affecting recurrence rate.
conclusionsIt appears that closed hernia sack preparation is superior to open regarding speed and recurrence. This was true for premature neonates, neonates and older children. All other outcome parameters including intra- and postoperative complications were similar. Thus, we recommend to use the closed preparation technique whenever possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.