Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35666124›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022

Studying the Dynamics of a Complex G-Quadruplex System: Insights into the Comparison of MD and NMR Data.

Matteo Castelli, Filippo Doria, Mauro Freccero, Giorgio Colombo, Elisabetta Moroni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo CastelliDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, V.le Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Filippo DoriaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, V.le Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Mauro FrecceroDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, V.le Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-1526
Giorgio ColomboDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pavia, V.le Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-668X
Elisabetta MoroniInstitute of Chemical Sciences and Technologies SCITEC-CNR, Via Mario Bianco, 9, 20131 Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are coming of age in the study of nucleic acids, including specific tertiary structures such as G-quadruplexes. While being precious for providing structural and dynamic information inaccessible to experiments at the atomistic level of resolution, MD simulations in this field may still be limited by several factors. These include the force fields used, different models for ion parameters, ionic strengths, and water models. We address various aspects of this problem by analyzing and comparing microsecond-long atomistic simulations of the G-quadruplex structure formed by the human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat (HIV LTR)-III sequence for which nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures are available. The system is studied in different conditions, systematically varying the ionic strengths, ion numbers, and water models. We comparatively analyze the dynamic behavior of the G-quadruplex motif in various conditions and assess the ability of each simulation to satisfy the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-derived experimental constraints and structural parameters. The conditions taking into account K

Indexed as

G-QuadruplexesHIV InfectionsHumansIonsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationWaterIonsWater

Identifiers

PMID35666124
PMCPMC9281369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.