Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665948›Full record

ReviewPharmacotherapy2022

Safety and effectiveness of NMDA receptor antagonists for depression: A multidisciplinary review.

Thomas J Moore, Abdallah Alami, G Caleb Alexander, Donald R Mattison

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06566482 (Mini-dose Dexmedetomidine-Esketamine Supplemented Analgesia for Postoperative Sleep Promotion in Patients at High-risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06566482 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Mini-dose Dexmedetomidine-Esketamine Supplemented Analgesia for Postoperative Sleep Promotion in Patients at High-risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsObstructive Sleep Apnea, Surgery, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsDexmedetomidine-esketamine combination, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative evaluation of multiple treatment regimens for treatment-resistant depression.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Six Bioactive Small Molecules fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Towards an expanded neurocognitive account of ketamine's rapid antidepressant effects.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas J MooreCenter for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0994-836X
Abdallah AlamiMcLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
G Caleb AlexanderCenter for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Donald R MattisonMcLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAJohns Hopkins University · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ketamine, an anesthetic available since 1970, and esketamine, its newer S-enantiomer, provide a novel approach for the treatment of depression and other psychiatric disorders. At subanesthetic doses, the two drugs, along with their older congener, phencyclidine (PCP), induce a transient, altered mental state by blocking the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor for glutamate, the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. This multidisciplinary review examines the pharmacology/direct effects on consciousness, effectiveness in depression and acute suicidality, and safety of these fast-acting NMDA antagonists. To capture the essence of 60 years of peer-reviewed literature, we used a semi-structured approach to the subtopics, each of which required a different search strategy. We review the evidence for the three primary reported benefits of the two clinical drugs when used for depression: success in difficult-to-treat patients, rapid onset of action within a day, and immediate effects on suicidality. Key safety issues include the evidence-and lack thereof-for the effects of repeatedly inducing this altered mental state, and whether an adequate safety margin exists to rule out the neurotoxic effects seen in animal studies. This review includes evidence from multiple sources that raise substantial questions about both safety and effectiveness of ketamine and esketamine for psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

DepressionKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAnimalsHumansMammalsN-MethylaspartatePhencyclidineKetamineN-MethylaspartatePhencyclidineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatedrug approvalesketamineevidence-based toxicologyketamine hydrochloridephencyclidinephencyclidine-related disordersUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID35665948
PMCPMC9540857
OpenAlexW4281671491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.