ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2023
Gross motor function prediction using natural language processing in cerebral palsy.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of artificial intelligence for outcome assessment in pediatric rehabilitation: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Advancing the Implementation of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Rehabilitation Learning Health Systems: Insights From the 2024 LeaRRn Summit.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Serum Proteomics Reveals Diagnostic Biomarkers and Molecular Pathways in Cerebral Palsy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Natural language processing systems for extracting information from electronic health records about activities of daily living. A systematic review.JAMIA open · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence to improve rehabilitation care for children with developmental conditions: Some ethical considerations.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo predict ambulatory status and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) by applying natural language processing (NLP) to electronic health record (EHR) clinical notes.
methodIndividuals aged 8 to 26 years with a diagnosis of CP in the EHR between January 2009 and November 2020 (~12 years of data) were included in a cross-sectional retrospective cohort of 2483 patients. The cohort was divided into train-test and validation groups. Positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated for prediction of ambulatory status and GMFCS levels.
resultsThe median age was 15 years (interquartile range 10-20 years) for the total cohort, with 56% being male and 75% White. The validation group resulted in 70% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 81% positive predictive value, and 0.89 AUC for predicting ambulatory status. NLP applied to the EHR differentiated between GMFCS levels I-II and III (15% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 46% positive predictive value, and 0.71 AUC); and IV and V (81% sensitivity, 51% specificity, 70% positive predictive value, and 0.75 AUC).
interpretationNLP applied to the EHR demonstrated excellent differentiation between ambulatory and non-ambulatory status, and good differentiation between GMFCS levels I-II and III, and IV and V. Clinical use of NLP may help to individualize functional characterization and management. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Natural language processing (NLP) applied to the electronic health record (EHR) can predict ambulatory status in children with cerebral palsy (CP). NLP provides good prediction of Gross Motor Function Classification System level in children with CP using the EHR. NLP methods described could be integrated in an EHR system to provide real-time information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.