Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665868›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2022

Clipping versus coiling for treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a retrospective Italian multicenter experience.

Carmelo Lucio Sturiale, Alba Scerrati, Luca Ricciardi, Oriela Rustemi, Anna Maria Auricchio, Nicolò Norri, Amedeo Piazza, Fabio Ranieri, Alberto Tomatis, Alessio Albanese and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preventive clipping versus coiling in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review to explore safety and efficacy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Carmelo Lucio SturialeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8 - 00168, Rome, Italy. cropcircle.2000@virgilio.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-2492
Alba ScerratiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Luca RicciardiNESMOS Department, Neurosurgical Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Oriela RustemiDepartment of Neurosurgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Anna Maria AuricchioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8 - 00168, Rome, Italy.
Nicolò NorriDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Amedeo PiazzaNESMOS Department, Neurosurgical Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Fabio RanieriDepartment of Neurosurgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Alberto TomatisNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Alessio AlbaneseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8 - 00168, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo Di EgidioRadiology Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Marco FarnetiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Annunziato MangiolaNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Enrico MarcheseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8 - 00168, Rome, Italy.
Antonino RacoNESMOS Department, Neurosurgical Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo VolpinDepartment of Neurosurgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Gianluca TrevisiNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITOspedale San Bortolo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITOspedale di Santo Spirito · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment has emerged as the predominant approach in intracranial aneurysms. However, surgical clipping is still considered the best treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms in referral centers. Here we compared short- and long-term clinical and neuroradiological outcomes in patients with MCA aneurysms undergoing clipping or coiling in 5 Italian referral centers for cerebrovascular surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 411 consecutive patients admitted between 2015 and 2019 for ruptured and unruptured MCA aneurysm. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between demographic, clinical, and radiological parameters and ruptured status, type of surgical treatment, and clinical outcome at discharge and follow-up were performed. Clipping was performed in 340 (83%) cases, coiling in 71 (17%). Clipping was preferred in unruptured aneurysms and in those showing collateral branches originating from neck/dome. Surgery achieved a higher rate of complete occlusion at discharge and follow-up. Clipping and coiling showed no difference in clinical outcome in both ruptured and unruptured cases. In ruptured aneurysms age, presenting clinical status, intracerebral hematoma at onset, and treatment-related complications were significantly associated with outcome at both short- and long-term follow-up. The presence of collaterals/perforators originating from dome/neck of the aneurysms also worsened the short-term clinical outcome. In unruptured cases, only treatment-related complications such as ischemia and hydrocephalus were associated with poor outcome. Clipping still seems superior to coiling in providing better short- and long-term occlusion rates in MCA aneurysms, and at the same time, it appears as safe as coiling in terms of clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticIntracranial AneurysmHumansRetrospective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsClippingCoilingEndovascularIntracranial aneurysmMiddle cerebral artery

Identifiers

PMID35665868
PMCPMC9492556
OpenAlexW4281764229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.