Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665822›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2022

Expansion and Diversification of the 14-3-3 Gene Family in Camellia sinensis.

Zai-Bao Zhang, Xue-Ke Wang, Shuo Wang, Qian Guan, Wei Zhang, Zhi-Guo Feng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zai-Bao ZhangKey Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology in Henan Province, Xinyang, Henan, China. zaibaozhang79@163.com.
Xue-Ke WangCollege of Life Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Shuo WangCollege of Life Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Qian GuanRenal Department of Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wei ZhangCollege of Life Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Zhi-Guo FengSchool of Science, Qiongtai Normal University, Hainan, China. ffzzgg@163.com.
Xinyang Normal University · CNQiongtai Teachers College · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

14-3-3 proteins are signal moderators in sensing various stresses and play essential functions in plant growth and development. Although, 14-3-3 gene families have been identified and characterized in many plant species, its evolution has not been studied systematically. In this study, the plant 14-3-3 family was comprehensively analyzed from green algae to angiosperm. Our result indicated that plant 14-3-3 originated during the early evolutionary history of green algae and expanded in terricolous plants. Twenty-six 14-3-3 genes were identified in the tea genome. RNA-seq analysis showed that tea 14-3-3 genes display different expression patterns in different organs. Moreover, the expression of most tea 14-3-3 genes displayed variable expression patterns under different abiotic and biotic stresses. In conclusion, our results elucidate the evolutionary origin of plant 14-3-3 genes, and beneficial for understanding their biological functions and improving tea agricultural traits in the future.

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhylogenyPlant ProteinsStress, PhysiologicalTeaPlant ProteinsTea14-3-3 geneAbiotic stressCamellia sinensisEvolutionary relationshipPhylogenetic tree

Identifiers

PMID35665822
OpenAlexW4281645500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.