Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665642›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2022

Loss of E-cadherin Induces IGF1R Activation and Reveals a Targetable Pathway in Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma.

Ashuvinee Elangovan, Jagmohan Hooda, Laura Savariau, Susrutha Puthanmadhomnarayanan, Megan E Yates, Jian Chen, Daniel D Brown, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Steffi Oesterreich, Jennifer M Atkinson and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. E-Cadherin-Mediated Cell-Cell Adhesion and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashuvinee ElangovanMolecular Genetics and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-5113-0970
Jagmohan HoodaWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-5001-6092
Laura SavariauWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-9481
Susrutha PuthanmadhomnarayananWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Megan E YatesWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jian ChenWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Daniel D BrownInstitute for Precision Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-7410-9514
Priscilla F McAuliffeWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Steffi OesterreichWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-6923
Jennifer M AtkinsonWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-5164-5114
Adrian V LeeWomen's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center (HCC), Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-9917-514X
University of Pittsburgh · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USPrecision Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Developing and credentialing murine models of ILCR01CA252378 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Adrian V Lee, Steffi Oesterreich · 2021 to 2026
$3.0M
FGFR4: A druggable mediator of endocrine resistance in breast cancerR01CA224909 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI OESTERREICH, STEFFI · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Functional Characterization and Clinical Prevalence of ESR1 Fusions in Advanced Endocrine Resistant Breast CancerF30CA250167 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YATES, MEGAN · 2020 to 2024
$249k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA250167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA224909NCI NIH HHS R01 CA252378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No special-type breast cancer [NST; commonly known as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)] and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are the two major histological subtypes of breast cancer with significant differences in clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. The defining pathognomonic feature of ILC is loss of cellular adhesion protein, E-cadherin (CDH1). We have previously shown that E-cadherin functions as a negative regulator of the IGF1R and propose that E-cadherin loss in ILC sensitizes cells to growth factor signaling that thus alters their sensitivity to growth factor-signaling inhibitors and their downstream activators. To investigate this potential therapeutic vulnerability, we generated CRISPR-mediated CDH1 knockout (CDH1 KO) IDC cell lines (MCF7, T47D, and ZR75.1) to uncover the mechanism by which loss of E-cadherin results in IGF pathway activation. CDH1 KO cells demonstrated enhanced invasion and migration that was further elevated in response to IGF1, serum and collagen I. CDH1 KO cells exhibited increased sensitivity to IGF resulting in elevated downstream signaling. Despite minimal differences in membranous IGF1R levels between wild-type (WT) and CDH1 KO cells, significantly higher ligand-receptor interaction was observed in the CDH1 KO cells, potentially conferring enhanced downstream signaling activation. Critically, increased sensitivity to IGF1R, PI3K, Akt, and MEK inhibitors was observed in CDH1 KO cells and ILC patient-derived organoids. IMPLICATIONS: Overall, this suggests that these targets require further exploration in ILC treatment and that CDH1 loss may be exploited as a biomarker of response for patient stratification.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCadherinsFemaleHumansReceptor, IGF Type 1Signal TransductionCadherinsIGF1R protein, humanReceptor, IGF Type 1

Identifiers

PMID35665642
PMCPMC9444924
OpenAlexW4282923878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.