Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665538›Full record

ReviewConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2023

Status of Southeast Asia's marine sharks and rays.

Naomi Clark-Shen, Andrew Chin, Sirachai Arunrugstichai, Jessica Labaja, Meira Mizrahi, Benaya Simeon, Neil Hutchinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Status of Southeast Asia's marine sharks and rays.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naomi Clark-ShenJames Cook University Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8003-6681
Andrew ChinCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1813-4042
Sirachai ArunrugstichaiAow Thai Marine Ecology Center, FREC Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jessica LabajaLarge Marine Vertebrates Research Institute Philippines, Jagna, Philippines.
Meira MizrahiWildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar Programme, Yangon, Myanmar.
Benaya SimeonFisheries Resource Centre of Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia.
Neil HutchinsonJames Cook University Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8782-3493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Southeast Asia, elasmobranchs are particularly threatened. We synthesized knowledge from the peer-reviewed and gray literature on elasmobranchs in the region, including their fisheries, status, trade, biology, and management. We found that 59% of assessed species are threatened with extinction and 72.5% are in decline; rays were more threatened than sharks. Research and conservation is complicated by the socioeconomic contexts of the countries, geopolitical issues in the South China Sea, and the overcapacity and multispecies nature of fisheries that incidentally capture elasmobranchs. The general paucity of data, funds, personnel, and enforcement hinders management. Reduced capacity in the general fishery sector and marine protected areas of sufficient size (for elasmobranchs and local enforcement capabilities) are among recommendations to strengthen conservation.

Indexed as

SharksAnimalsChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesFisheriesbycatchcaptura accesoriaelasmobranchelasmobranquiofisheryMar del Sur de ChinamercadopesqueríaSouth China Seatrade板鳃类, 渔业, 中国南海, 副渔获物, 贸易i

Identifiers

PMID35665538
PMCPMC10087767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.