Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665352›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Quan-You Gao, Fei-Long Wei, Tian Li, Kai-Long Zhu, Ming-Rui Du, Wei Heng, Fan Yang, Hao-Ran Gao, Ji-Xian Qian, Cheng-Pei Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards Microbiota-Targeted Interventions in Acute Pancreatitis: Evidence From Meta-Analysis and Mendelian Randomization.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quan-You GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fei-Long WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Tian LiSchool of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Kai-Long ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ming-Rui DuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Wei HengDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hao-Ran GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ji-Xian QianDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Cheng-Pei ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is an effective surgical option for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with spondylolisthesis. However, few studies have discussed oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) with MIS-TLIF. Objective: To evaluate postoperative improvements, complications, and reoperation rates between patients with LSS undergoing OLIF or MIS-TLIF. Methods: We retrospectively studied 113 LLS patients who underwent OLIF (53) or MIS-TLIF (60) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between January 2016 and December 2018. We measured estimated blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, reoperation, and complication incidence, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, discal and foraminal height and lumbar lordotic angle. Results: The mean age was 58.81 ± 0.9 years. The TLIF group had increased operation time, blood loss, and hospital stays ( Conclusion: Patients undergoing OLIF with LSS improved similarly to MIS-TLIF patients. OLIF restored disc height, foraminal height and lumbar lordotic angle more successfully than did MIS-TLIF.

Indexed as

lumbar spinal stenosisMinimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF)oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)postoperative improvementsretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID35665352
PMCPMC9160969
OpenAlexW4280554722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.