ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
CO
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bilateral congenital ectropion uveae (CEU) is rare syndrome, usually accompanied by refractory glaucoma. Proper and timely treatment was very important for the prognosis. The report aims to compare the long-term outcomes and complications between the two eyes after different approaches of surgery in a case of bilateral CEU with advanced glaucoma. Case Presentation: The patient was a 20-year-old male with bilateral CEU and glaucoma. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was 48 mm Hg in the right eye (OD) and 52 mm Hg in the left eye (OS). The vertical cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio was nearly 1.0 in both eyes. Despite maximum medical therapy, the target IOP could not be achieved. Therefore, CO Conclusions: To our knowledge, this was the first attempt to perform two different surgeries, CLASS and MAT, in both eyes of a single patient presented with bilateral CEU with glaucoma. Our results showed that the IOP was lower after CLASS, but there were potential complications such as shallow anterior chamber and complicated cataract. MAT could achieve a moderate IOP-lowing effect but had a higher safety. CLASS and MAT may be considered effective surgical options for the management of such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.