Trial reportComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Effect of Narrative Nursing Combined with Thinking Map Health Education on Parturient Self-Efficacy and Neonatal Nursing Ability.
Trial report in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Breastfeeding interventions for preventing postpartum depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Narrative Nursing Intervention on Patients with Specific Digestive Tract Malignancies (Esophageal, Gastric, and Intestinal Cancers): A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Retracted: Effect of Narrative Nursing Combined with Thinking Map Health Education on Parturient Self-Efficacy and Neonatal Nursing Ability.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Analysis and Research on Influencing Factors of College Students' Satisfaction with Physical Education.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-13Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/792AF113BE66DCB790830CA5C89ACE
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The motivation behind this study is to explore the influence of narrative nursing combined with thinking map health education on parturient self-efficacy and neonatal nursing ability. To verify this claim, we have selected 60 parturients who were treated in the hospital from February 2019 to April 2021. Moreover, these patients were randomly assigned to control and study groups. The former received narrative nursing, and the latter received narrative nursing combined with thinking map health education. The nursing satisfaction, maternal and neonatal nursing ability, maternal health knowledge awareness score, maternal self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression scores were compared. Initially, we have compared the nursing satisfaction: in the study group, 22 cases were satisfied, 8 cases were basically satisfied, and 0 cases were dissatisfied, and the satisfaction rate was 100.00%; in the control group, 12 cases were satisfied, 14 cases were basically satisfied, and 4 cases were dissatisfied, and the satisfaction rate was 86.67%. The nursing satisfaction in the study group was higher compared to the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.