Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665240›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Machine learning of COVID-19 clinical data identifies population structures with therapeutic potential.

David Greenwood, Thomas Taverner, Nicola J Adderley, Malcolm James Price, Krishna Gokhale, Christopher Sainsbury, Suzy Gallier, Carly Welch, Elizabeth Sapey, Duncan Murray and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

David GreenwoodInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Thomas TavernerInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicola J AdderleyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Malcolm James PriceInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Krishna GokhaleInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christopher SainsburyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Suzy GallierUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Carly WelchUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth SapeyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Duncan MurrayInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hilary FanningUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Simon BallInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Wayne CroftInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul MossInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21015Medical Research Council MC_PC_21028Medical Research Council MR/V027913/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 are heterogeneous and there is interest in defining subgroups for prognostic modeling and development of treatment algorithms. We obtained 28 demographic and laboratory variables in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. These comprised a training cohort (n = 6099) and two validation cohorts during the first and second waves of the pandemic (n = 996; n = 1011). Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) dimension reduction and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) analysis was used to define patient clusters. 29 clusters were defined in the training cohort and associated with markedly different mortality rates, which were predictive within confirmation datasets. Deconvolution of clinical features within clusters identified unexpected relationships between variables. Integration of large datasets using UMAP-assisted clustering can therefore identify patient subgroups with prognostic information and uncovers unexpected interactions between clinical variables. This application of machine learning represents a powerful approach for delineating disease pathogenesis and potential therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Bioinformaticsmedical informaticsViral microbiology

Identifiers

PMID35665240
PMCPMC9153184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.