ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Mass brain tissue lost after decompressive craniectomy: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe brain is the most important organ to maintain life. However, the amount of brain tissue required for maintaining life in humans has not been previously reported. CASE SUMMARY: A 33-year-old woman fell from the third floor three months before admission to our department. She received a decompressive craniectomy soon after injury. After the operation, operative incision disunion occurred due to the high pressure. Brain tissue flowed from the incision, and intracranial infection occurred. She fell into deep coma and was sent to our hospital. Her right temporal surgical incision was not healed and had a cranial defect of 10 cm × 10 cm. Her intracranial cavity was observed from the skull defect, and the brain tissue was largely lost. In addition, no brain tissue was observed by visual inspection. Cranial computed tomography showed that only a small amount of brain tissue density shadow was compressed in the cerebellum and brainstem. Four days after hospitalization in our hospital, her parents transferred her to a hospital near her hometown. The patient died six days after discharge from our hospital.
conclusionThis rare case provides some proof of the importance of the brainstem in the maintenance of cardiac rhythm and vascular tension. Neurosurgeons should carefully protect brainstem neurons during operations. Clinicians can maintain the cardiac rhythm of patients who lose their major brain tissue with modern technology, but the family of the patients should be aware of death and end-life care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.