ArticleStat2021
Empirical Bayesian Analysis Through the Lens of a Particular Class of Constrained Bayesian Hierarchical Models.
Article in Stat, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Empirical Bayesian analysis is a well-known approach that incorporates an estimator into a Bayesian analysis. In this article, we offer another approach, which has several useful properties. Our solution is based on the framework introduced by Yekutieli (2012) to account for the variability introduced by selecting parameters. Specifically, we assume that the unknown parameter is contained within a ball centered at an estimator, and the radius is given a prior distribution. We refer to our method as the auxiliary parameter constrained Bayesian hierarchical model (C-BHM). This general framework is particularly exciting as traditional empirical Bayesian analysis and parametric Bayesian analysis can be written as special cases. Hence, this C-BHM represents a unifying framework within the area of Bayesian statistics. Several technical results are provided. Furthermore, we show analytically that one can outperform both empirical and fully Bayesian analysis through the Bayes factor. We illustrate the C-BHM to extend the Fay-Herriot model, which is often used in the survey sampling setting. To demonstrate the usefulness of our method we provide simulations and an illustration to data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau's Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.