Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35665093›Full record

ArticleStat2021

Empirical Bayesian Analysis Through the Lens of a Particular Class of Constrained Bayesian Hierarchical Models.

Jonathan R Bradley, Qingying Zong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stat, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan R BradleyDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Florida, United States.
Qingying ZongDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Florida, United States.

Funding

Novel Statistical Methods for Multi-omics Data Integration in Alzheimer's DiseaseR03AG070669 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRADLEY, JONATHAN RAY, WU, CHONG · 2021 to 2022
$296k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG070669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empirical Bayesian analysis is a well-known approach that incorporates an estimator into a Bayesian analysis. In this article, we offer another approach, which has several useful properties. Our solution is based on the framework introduced by Yekutieli (2012) to account for the variability introduced by selecting parameters. Specifically, we assume that the unknown parameter is contained within a ball centered at an estimator, and the radius is given a prior distribution. We refer to our method as the auxiliary parameter constrained Bayesian hierarchical model (C-BHM). This general framework is particularly exciting as traditional empirical Bayesian analysis and parametric Bayesian analysis can be written as special cases. Hence, this C-BHM represents a unifying framework within the area of Bayesian statistics. Several technical results are provided. Furthermore, we show analytically that one can outperform both empirical and fully Bayesian analysis through the Bayes factor. We illustrate the C-BHM to extend the Fay-Herriot model, which is often used in the survey sampling setting. To demonstrate the usefulness of our method we provide simulations and an illustration to data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau's Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) program.

Indexed as

Empirical BayesFay-Herriot ModelOfficial StatisticsOracle Bayes

Identifiers

PMID35665093
PMCPMC9165446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.