Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664985›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2021

An appraisal of laboratory models of androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review.

S Ntshingila, N P Khumalo, M Engel, A T Arowolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biomedicines · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Androgenetic alopecia: An update.JAAD international · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S NtshingilaHair and Skin Research Laboratory Division of Dermatology Department of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences and Groote Schuur Hospital University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.
N P KhumaloHair and Skin Research Laboratory Division of Dermatology Department of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences and Groote Schuur Hospital University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-1900
M EngelDepartment of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences and Groote Schuur Hospital University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.
A T ArowoloHair and Skin Research Laboratory Division of Dermatology Department of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences and Groote Schuur Hospital University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-8835
University of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of non-scarring alopecia in humans. Several studies have used different laboratory models to study the pathogenesis and interventions for AGA. These study models have proved beneficial and have led to the approval of two drugs. However, the need to build on existing knowledge remains by examining the relevance of study models to the disease. Objective: We sought to appraise laboratory or pre-clinical models of AGA. Method: We searched through databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, World CAT, Scopus and Google Scholar) for articles on AGA-related studies from 1942 to March 2019 with a focus on study models. Results: The search rendered 101 studies after screening and deduplication. Several studies (70) used in vitro models, mostly consisting of two-dimensional monolayer cells for experiments involving the characterization of androgen and 5-alpha reductase (5AR) and inhibition thereof, the effects of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and biomarker(s) of AGA. Twenty-seven studies used in vivo models of mice and monkeys to investigate DHT synthesis, the expression and inhibition of 5AR and hair growth. Only four studies used AGA-related or healthy excisional/punch biopsy explants as ex vivo models to study the action of 5AR inhibitors and AGA-associated genes. No study used three-dimensional [3-D] organoids or organotypic human skin culture models. Conclusion: We recommend clinically relevant laboratory models like human or patient-derived 3-D organoids or organotypic skin in AGA-related studies. These models are closer to human scalp tissue and minimize the use of laboratory animals and could ultimately facilitate novel therapeutics.

Identifiers

PMID35664985
PMCPMC9060143
OpenAlexW3134775915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.