Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664933›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2022

Improved Patient Experience and Outcomes: Is Patient-Provider Concordance the Key?

Sonia V Otte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The patient perspective on diversity-sensitive care: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. County-Level Analysis of the Health Impact of Black Physicians in Georgia.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  7. Shared Decision Making Beyond Shared Identity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Minority Student Tax.Family medicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sonia V OtteIndependent Scholar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-516X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health disparities remain ubiquitous in the United States despite initiatives by the federal government and other organizations. A long-term solution for health inequity is needed in order to help improve patient outcomes for all. The purpose of this review is to examine if racial, gender, or multifactorial concordance (eg, race, age, gender, education, language) between patient and provider leads to a better patient experience and improved health outcomes. A PubMed search for articles published between 2016 and 2021 resulted in 23 separate studies that met inclusion criteria. The results from these studies were inconclusive in determining an association between patient-provider concordance and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the positive, neutral, and sometimes negative impact of patient-provider concordance. By diversifying healthcare professions and improving cultural competency and communication training programs, providers may be better prepared to care for diverse populations in both concordant and discordant patient relationships.

Indexed as

clinician–patient relationshipcommunicationculture/diversitypatient engagementpatient outcomespatient–provider concordancepatient/relationship-centered skillspatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID35664933
PMCPMC9158407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.