ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Effect of Training Healthcare Providers in Helping Babies Breathe Program on Neonatal Mortality Rates.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of interprofessional blended learning with low-fidelity simulation on neonatal resuscitation skills among interns: a quasi-experimental study in Tanzania.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Assessment tools for neonatal resuscitation and their validity evidence: a scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Training in the Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) Program has been associated with a reduction in early neonatal mortality rate (ENMR), the neonatal mortality rate (NMR), and fresh stillbirth rate (FSBR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This program was implemented in five different healthcare facilities in the Oliver Reginald Tambo (ORT) District, South Africa from September 2015 to December 2020. Objective: To determine and compare the FSBR, ENMR, and NMR between 2015 before initiation of the program (baseline) and subsequent years up to 2020 following the implementation of facility-based training of HBB in five hospitals in ORT District. Methods: Records of perinatal statistics from January 2015 to December 2020 were reviewed to calculate FSBR, ENMR, and NMR. Data were collected from the five healthcare facilities which included two district hospitals (Hospital A&B), two regional hospitals (Hospital C&D), and one tertiary hospital (Hospital E). Comparisons were made between pre- (2015) and post- (2016-2020) HBB implementation periods. Differences in changes over time were also assessed using linear regression analysis. Results: There were 19,275 births in 2015, increasing to 22,192 in 2020 with the majority (55.3%) of births occurring in regional hospitals. There were significant reductions in ENMR (OR-0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87) and NMR (OR-0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.90), but not in FSBR, in the five hospitals combined when comparing the two time periods. Significant reduction was also noted in trends over time in ENMR ( Conclusion: There was an overall reduction of 22% and 19% in ENMR and NMR, respectively, from pre- to post-HBB implementation periods, although there were variations from year to year over the 5-year period and, across hospitals. These differences suggest that there were other factors that affected the perinatal/neonatal outcomes in the hospital sites in addition to the implementation of training in HBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.