Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Italian Version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: Evaluation of the Scale Reliability and Ability to Detect Delirium Compared to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Physicians Clinical Evaluation.

Paola Claudia Fazio, Marco Daverio, Maristella Masola, Igor D'Angelo, Sara Frison, Cristina Zaggia, Silvio Simeone, Gianluca Pucciarelli, Dario Gregori, Rosanna Comoretto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paola Claudia FazioPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Marco DaverioPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Maristella MasolaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Igor D'AngeloPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Sara FrisonPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Cristina ZaggiaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Silvio SimeoneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University "Magna Graecia," Catanzaro, Italy.
Gianluca PucciarelliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Rosanna ComorettoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Angela AmigoniPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delirium is an acute brain dysfunction associated with increased length of hospitalization, mortality, and high healthcare costs especially in patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) is a screening tool for evaluating delirium in pediatric patients. This tool has already been used and validated in other languages but not in Italian. Objectives: To test the reliability of the Italian version of the CAPD to screen PICU patients for delirium and to assess the agreement between CAPD score and PICU physician clinical evaluation of delirium. Methods: Prospective double-blinded observational cohort study of patients admitted to a tertiary academic center PICU for at least 48 h from January 2020 to August 2021. We evaluated intra- and inter-rater agreement using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The ability of the scale to detect delirium was evaluated by comparing the nurses' CAPD assessments with the clinical evaluation of a PICU physician with expertise in analgosedation using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Measurements and Main Results: Seventy patients were included in the study. The prevalence of pediatric delirium was 54% (38/70) when reported by a positive CAPD score and 21% (15/70) when diagnosed by the PICU physician. The CAPD showed high agreement levels both for the intra-rater (ICC 1 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99) and the inter-rater (ICC 2 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.96) assessments. In patients with suspected delirium according to the CAPD scale, the observed sensitivity and specificity of the scale were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.68-1.00) and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42-0.70), respectively. The AUC observed was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.8490). Conclusion: The Italian version of the CAPD seems a reliable tool for the identification of patients at high risk of developing delirium in pediatric critical care settings. Compared to the clinical evaluation of the PICU physician, the use of the CAPD scale avoids a possible underestimation of delirium in the pediatric population.

Indexed as

CAPDCornell Assessment of Pediatric Deliriumpediatric deliriumpediatric intensive care unitPICU

Identifiers

PMID35664881
PMCPMC9157792
OpenAlexW4280593302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.