Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664842›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Diagnostic Investigation of 100 Cases of Abortion in Sheep in Uruguay: 2015-2021.

Matías A Dorsch, María E Francia, Leandro R Tana, Fabiana C González, Andrés Cabrera, Lucía Calleros, Margarita Sanguinetti, Maila Barcellos, Leticia Zarantonelli, Camila Ciuffo and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First report ofBrazilian journal of veterinary medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Investigation ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. First report on identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Common diseases of sheep (Open veterinary journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Matías A DorschPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
María E FranciaLaboratorio de Biología de Apicomplejos, Instituto Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Leandro R TanaLaboratorio de Biología de Apicomplejos, Instituto Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Fabiana C GonzálezLaboratorio de Biología de Apicomplejos, Instituto Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Andrés CabreraLaboratorio de Interacciones Hospedero-Patógeno, Instituto Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Lucía CallerosSección de Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Margarita SanguinettiSección de Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Maila BarcellosSección de Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Leticia ZarantonelliUnidad Mixta Instituto Pasteur de Montevideo e Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (UMPI), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Camila CiuffoUnidad Mixta Instituto Pasteur de Montevideo e Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (UMPI), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Leticia MayaLaboratorio de Virología Molecular, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Centro Universitario Regional (CENUR) Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.
Matías CastellsLaboratorio de Virología Molecular, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Centro Universitario Regional (CENUR) Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.
Santiago MirazoLaboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Caroline da Silva SilveiraPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Ana RabazaPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Rubén D CaffarenaPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Benjamín Doncel DíazPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Virginia AráozPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Carolina MattoLaboratorio Regional Noroeste, División de Laboratorios Veterinarios (DILAVE) Miguel C. Rubino, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP), Paysandú, Uruguay.
Joaquín I ArmendanoFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA), Tandil, Argentina.
Sofía SaladaSecretariado Uruguayo de la Lana (SUL), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Martín FragaPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.
Sergio FierroSecretariado Uruguayo de la Lana (SUL), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Federico GiannittiPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to identify causes of abortion through laboratory investigations in sheep flocks in Uruguay. One hundred cases of abortion, comprising 58 fetuses, 36 fetuses with their placentas, and 6 placentas were investigated in 2015-2021. Cases were subjected to gross and microscopic pathologic examinations, and microbiological and serological testing for the identification of causes of abortion, including protozoal, bacterial, and viral pathogens. An etiologic diagnosis was determined in 46 (46%) cases, including 33 (33%) cases caused by infectious pathogens, as determined by the detection of a pathogen along with the identification of fetoplacental lesions attributable to the detected pathogen. Twenty-seven cases (27%) were caused by

Indexed as

abortioncampylobacteriosisdystociainfectious diseasespathologyreproductive lossessheeptoxoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID35664842
PMCPMC9161216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.