ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
PixelPrint: Three-dimensional printing of realistic patient-specific lung phantoms for CT imaging.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a CZT-based photon-counting detector CT prototype for low-dose lung cancer screening using patient-specific lung phantoms.Research square · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a CZT-based photon-counting detector CT prototype for low-dose lung cancer screening using patient-specific lung phantoms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- PixelPrint 4D : A 3D Printing Method of Fabricating Patient-Specific Deformable CT Phantoms for Respiratory Motion Applications.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
- Optimization and fabrication of a novel 3D-printed variable density range modulation device for proton FLASH beams.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Hybrid phantom for lung CT: Design and validation.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A novel method to simulate radiographs of 3D printed objects.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Lifelike and Deformable Lung Phantoms for 4DCT Imaging: A Three-Dimensional Printing Approach.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024Article
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- 3D printed phantom with 12 000 submillimeter lesions to improve efficiency in CT detectability assessment.Medical physics · 2024Article
- LifelikeProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Design and fabrication of 3D-printed patient-specific soft tissue and bone phantoms for CT imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Design and fabrication of 3D-printed patient-specific soft tissue and bone phantoms for CT imaging.Research square · 2023Article
- Design and fabrication of 3D-printed patient-specific soft tissue and bone phantoms for CT imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific computed tomography lung phantoms: a reader study.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phantoms are essential tools for assessing and verifying performance in computed tomography (CT). Realistic patient-based lung phantoms that accurately represent textures and densities are essential in developing and evaluating novel CT hardware and software. This study introduces PixelPrint, a 3D-printing solution to create patient-specific lung phantoms with accurate contrast and textures. PixelPrint converts patient images directly into printer instructions, where density is modeled as the ratio of filament to voxel volume to emulate local attenuation values. For evaluation of PixelPrint, phantoms based on four COVID-19 pneumonia patients were manufactured and scanned with the original (clinical) CT scanners and protocols. Density and geometrical accuracies between phantom and patient images were evaluated for various anatomical features in the lung, and a radiomic feature comparison was performed for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 pneumonia patient-based phantoms. Qualitatively, CT images of the patient-based phantoms closely resemble the original CT images, both in texture and contrast levels, with clearly visible vascular and parenchymal structures. Regions-of-interest (ROIs) comparing attenuation demonstrated differences below 15 HU. Manual size measurements performed by an experienced thoracic radiologist revealed a high degree of geometrical correlation between identical patient and phantom features, with differences smaller than the intrinsic spatial resolution of the images. Radiomic feature analysis revealed high correspondence, with correlations of 0.95-0.99 between patient and phantom images. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of 3D-printed patient-based lung phantoms with accurate geometry, texture, and contrast that will enable protocol optimization, CT research and development advancements, and generation of ground-truth datasets for radiomic evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.