Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664613›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Minimizing the Barite Scale in Carbonate Formations during the Filter Cake Removal Process.

Jaber Al Jaberi, Abdulmalek Ahmed, Badr Bageri, Mahmoud Elsayed, Mohamed Mahmoud, Shirish Patil, Karem Al-Garadi, Assad Barri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaber Al JaberiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmalek AhmedDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Badr BageriDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7510-0933
Mahmoud ElsayedDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed MahmoudDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-9567
Shirish PatilDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-4912
Karem Al-GaradiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Assad BarriDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The barite scale is one of the most common scales in the oil and gas industry. It can form in the reservoir or precipitate in different production equipment. The formation of such a scale will significantly minimize the capillary diameter of the flow channels and consequently shrink the well productivity. On the other hand, the production of movable barite particles causes severe erosion for the installed equipment. There are several sources of the barite scale such as mixing of incompatible brines and solid invasion of the barite weighted during drilling. In addition, the barite scale could be produced during the interaction of the chelating agent solutions with the reservoir formation during the filter cake removal process (secondary damage). The main focus of this study is to prevent the barite scale inside the carbonate formations during filter cake removal. The capability of a solution consisting of both diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a novel solution to prevent barite scale formation in carbonate formations after the removal of the barite filter cake was evaluated. A series of laboratory experiments were accomplished to characterize the barite scale and evaluate the performance of the proposed solution. In particular, particle size distribution, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, core flooding, NMR spectroscopy, solubility test, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy tests were conducted for this aim. The experiments were performed using carbonate core samples. The results showed that the proposed solution was able to load 35 000 ppm barium in the presence of calcite ions. The addition of EDTA tended to inhibit the barite deposition and improve the rate of the calcite reaction. NMR results showed that a mixture of DTPA and EDTA (20%) can stimulate the macropores, resulting in an increase in the return permeability by 1.4-1.8 times of the initial value, while the precipitation that occurred in the micropores could be ignored with respect to the overall porosity improvements.

Identifiers

PMID35664613
PMCPMC9161417
OpenAlexW4280547251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.