ArticleACS omega2022
Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study for Preferring Coal Dust Wetting Agents.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multiscale Simulation and Experimental Study on the Microfog Evolution and Dust Control Mechanism Driven by Ultrasonic Atomization.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Influence of SiOJournal of molecular modeling · 2025Article
- Mechanism of wetting by anionic surfactants with different polar groups on hydrophilic and hydrophobic nano-silica.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Article
- Wettability Characteristics of Low-Rank Coals Under the Coupling Effect of High Mineralization and Surfactants.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Spreading Behavior and Wetting Characteristics of Anionic Surfactant Droplets Impacting Bituminous Coal.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Study of the Micromechanism of the Effect of Fatty Alcohol Poly(oxyethylene) Ether-9 on the Wettability of Jincheng Anthracite.ACS omega · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the efficiency of coal dust removal by water spray technology, the addition of wetting agents in water becomes the main dust removal method. The influence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDDS), and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) on the wettability of coal dust is studied by experimental and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Measurement of the contact angle and surface tension was accomplished via relevant experiments for the three wetting agents, and their adhesion work, spreading work, and wetting work were also calculated. A preferred experimental method of conventional coal dust wetting agent is optimized. The wettability of the three wetting agents upon bituminous coal follows the trend: SDS > SDDS > SDBS. The simulation was performed based on MD to derive the intermolecular interaction energy, diffusion coefficient of water molecules, and water molecule count in the vicinity of the hydrophilic groups of the wetting agents. The wetting mechanism and performance of the wetting agent solution on bituminous coal were identified. The simulation results of the wetting performance of the wetting agents are consistent with the experimental results, which verifies the reliability of the simulation method. An easy, time-saving, and labor-saving MD simulation method is proposed, which provides a novel insight for choosing various wetting agents of coal dust.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.