ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2022
Gender-Affirming Care With Transgender and Genderqueer Patients: A Standardized Patient Case.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- LGBTQ+ Health Care Training for OB/GYN Residents Using a Simulation-Based Learning Experience.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Transgender Health Emergencies: A Simulation on Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy in a Transgender Man.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Engaging and supporting standardized patients involved in equity-seeking healthcare training: a qualitative study.International journal of medical education · 2025Article
- A Systematic and Practical Framework on Gender and Sexual Diverse (GSD) Health for Internal Medicine Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Abdominal Pain in a Gender-Diverse Patient: A Standardized Patient Case for Second-Year Medical Students.Cureus · 2025Article
- Simulation Bridges LGBTQ+ Educational Gaps in Gynecologic Care: Menstrual Suppression for a Gender and Sexually Diverse Patient.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- LGBTQ+ health education for medical students in the United States: a narrative literature review.Medical education online · 2024Review
- Sexual and gender minority health: a roadmap for developing evidence-based medical school curricula.Canadian medical education journal · 2024Review
- Transgender and non-binary patient simulations can foster cultural sensitivity and knowledge among internal medicine residents: a pilot study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Assessing Patient Goals for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: A Standardized Patient Case for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023Article
- The Role of Medical Training in Ensuring Gender-Affirming Care Access in 2025 and Beyond.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients experience health disparities and bias in health care settings. To improve care for TGD patients, medical trainees can practice gender-affirming care skills such as inclusive communication and discussing hormone therapy through patient simulation. Systematically evaluating these simulation outcomes also helps educators improve training on gender-affirming care. Methods: A standardized patient case with a patient establishing primary care was developed for rising third-year medical students. The case featured multiple patient iterations to portray individuals with the same health history but a different gender identity and/or sex assigned at birth. Each student was randomly assigned to one patient encounter. Gender-affirming care skills were assessed through standardized patient checklists, postencounter notes, and preventive care recommendations. Results: Over 2 years, 286 students participated in the simulation. Transgender men and women, cisgender men and women, and genderqueer patients were portrayed. Performance gaps such as misgendering patients and incorrect cancer screening recommendations based on perceived gender identity (rather than sex assigned at birth) were documented. Ninety-eight percent of students agreed that the encounter helped them practice clinical skills needed to see actual patients, and students described the case as challenging but important. Discussion: This case served dual roles for medical training: (1) Students working with TGD patients practiced skills for gender-affirming care, and (2) portraying TGD patients along with cisgender patients allowed educators to identify biased recommendations that necessitated additional training. The outcomes further highlighted the importance of students routinely practicing gender-inclusive communication with all patients during simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.