ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022
A biobehavioral intervention to enhance recovery following hematopoietic cell transplantation: Protocol for a feasibility and acceptability randomized control trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mindfulness vs. sleep education during autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Feasibility of a randomized controlled pilot study.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Biobehavioral mechanisms underlying symptoms in cancer patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insomnia, fatigue, and depression are among the most persistent and distressing concerns for hematologic cancer patients recovering from hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This study will evaluate a novel behavioral intervention, Methods: The protocol herein evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of ReSET by conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial to compare the intervention with usual care. Adults undergoing HCT will be randomly assigned to ReSET or usual care. The ReSET arm will receive 3 face-to-face sessions and telephone coaching delivered in an individual format tailored to each patient. Patient-reported insomnia, fatigue, and depression will be the primary outcome measures. Actigraphy will be used to objectively quantify rest-activity patterns. Semi-structured interviews will evaluate participant satisfaction with ReSET. The goals are to determine: (1) participant satisfaction with and acceptability of the behavioral techniques; (2) facilitator fidelity and participant uptake of key intervention components; (3) ability to recruit, retain, and collect complete data from participants; (4) participant willingness to be randomized and acceptability of the control condition; and (5) validity and acceptability of the assessment strategy. Conclusion: The overarching goal is to optimize recovery following HCT with a brief, non-invasive intervention that can be implemented as a part of routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.