Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664484›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

A Proof-of-Concept Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of Day-Level Dynamics in Value-Based Decision-Making in Opioid Addiction.

Emmanuel E Alvarez, Sahar Hafezi, Darla Bonagura, Evan M Kleiman, Anna B Konova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapid and reliable computational markers of decision-making for predicting daily smoking behavior and smoking cessation treatment outcomes.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel E AlvarezDepartment of Neuroscience, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Sahar HafeziDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, University Behavioral Health Care, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Darla BonaguraDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, University Behavioral Health Care, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Evan M KleimanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Anna B KonovaDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, University Behavioral Health Care, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJohnson University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Decision Neuroscience of CravingR01DA054201 · NIDA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI KONOVA, ANNA BORISOVA · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Computational psychiatry investigation of the role of unrealistic optimism in opioid use disorder and relapseR01DA053282 · NIDA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI KONOVA, ANNA BORISOVA · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053282NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug addiction is thought to be characterized by risky and impulsive behavior despite harmful consequences. Whether these aspects of value-based decision-making in people with addiction are stable and trait-like, and the degree to which they vary within-person and are sensitive to changes in psychological state, remains unknown. In this pilot study, we examined the feasibility of distinguishing these state- vs. trait-like components by probing day-level dynamics of risk and time preferences in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) as they engaged with their natural environment. Methods: Twenty-three individuals with OUD receiving outpatient treatment (40% female; Results: Subjects demonstrated dynamic decision-making preferences, with 40-53% of the variation in known risk and ambiguity tolerance, and 67% in discounting, attributable to between-person vs. within-person (day-to-day) differences. We found that changes in psychological state were related to changes in risk preferences, with patients preferring riskier offers on days they reported being in a better mood but no differences between groups in aggregate level behavior. By contrast, temporal discounting was increased overall in patients compared to controls and was unrelated to global mood. The study was well-tolerated, but compliance rates were moderate and lower in patients. Conclusion: Our data support the idea that decision-making preferences in drug addiction exhibit substantial within-person variability and that this variability can be well-captured using remote data collection methods. Preliminary findings suggested that aspects of decision-making related to consideration of risk may be more sensitive to within-person change in global psychological state while those related to consideration of delay to reward, despite also being somewhat variable, stably differ from healthy levels. Identifying the cognitive factors that contribute to opioid use risk in a "real-world" setting may be important for identifying unique, time-sensitive targets for intervention.

Indexed as

decision-makingecological moment assessmentimpulsive choicemoodrisk tolerancestate-dependencesubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID35664484
PMCPMC9156899
OpenAlexW4280572797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.