Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664449›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022

Minimally invasive, indirect corneal neurotization using an ipsilateral sural nerve graft for early neurotrophic keratopathy.

Brendon W H Lee, Muhammad A Khan, Quan D Ngo, Krishna Tumuluri, Chameen Samarawickrama

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurotrophic keratopathy patients after minimally invasive corneal neurotization treated with RhNGF eyedrops: a case series.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brendon W H LeeFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Muhammad A KhanFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Quan D NgoFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Krishna TumuluriSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Chameen SamarawickramaFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Neurotrophic keratopathy is a degenerative disease characterized by damage to the corneal nerves leading to corneal hypoesthesia and anaesthesia. The resultant progressive visual deterioration is refractory to existing conventional treatment options. Corneal neurotization is a novel and effective surgical procedure that directly targets the underlying pathology of nerve loss by stimulating new corneal nerve growth. This study reports the outcomes and the pre- and postoperative in vivo confocal microscopy findings of the first published Australian case of indirect, minimally invasive, corneal neurotization using an ipsilateral sural nerve autograft. Observations: An 11-year-old boy developed corneal hypoesthesia in the left eye following surgical debulking of a cerebellopontine angle arachnoid cyst. He was diagnosed with Mackie Stage 1 neurotrophic keratopathy. Due to his hypoesthesia, he had developed recurrent microbial keratitis and corneal ulceration secondary to foreign bodies sustained during contact sports. At presentation, he reported photophobia and dry eye symptoms, corrected-distance visual acuity was 6/18, Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer demonstrated reduced corneal sensation (5-15mm), Schirmer's I test was 15mm, and in vivo confocal microscopy showed a complete absence of a subepithelial corneal plexus. He underwent indirect, minimally invasive, corneal neurotization using the ipsilateral supratrochlear nerve and a sural nerve autograft. Subjective improvement in corneal sensation was noticed by the patient at 2 months. Objective improvement, measured on Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer, was first observed at 6 months with steady stepwise improvement to 20-35mm at 21 months. Importantly, due to the increase in corneal sensation, the patient did not develop any further corneal complications. At 12 months, dry eye symptoms resolved and Schirmer's I test improved to 30mm. At 15 months, corrected-distance visual acuity improved to 6/5 and in vivo confocal microscopy demonstrated evidence of corneal reinnervation with nerves running through the subepithelial space surrounded by healthy and active keratocytes. Conclusions and importance: Corneal neurotization represents an exciting development in the armamentarium for the treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy and can be considered for younger patients with early-stage disease.

Indexed as

Corneal neurotizationCorneal sensationIn vivo confocal microscopyNeurotrophic keratopathySural nerve autograft

Identifiers

PMID35664449
PMCPMC9156881
OpenAlexW4280638294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.