ReviewCureus2022
Vitamin D Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical randomized trial of vitamin D and C supplementation in critically ill patients with respiratory failure.Nutrition journal · 2025Trial
- Impact of vitamin D supplementation in the prognosis of patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit - a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- Vitamin D maintenance in postoperative patients (D-ECISIVE): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- The association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and clinical outcomes in Chinese adult inpatients: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- SARS-CoV2 variants differentially impact on the plasma metabolome.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025Article
- Should I Supplement Vitamin D in a Patient With Sepsis?Journal of acute medicine · 2024Article
- Vitamin D supplementation during intensive care unit stay is associated with improved outcomes in critically Ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Longitudinal Evaluation of Vitamin D, Parathyroid Hormone, Antimicrobial Peptides, and Immunomodulatory Genes in Hospitalized Foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting outcomes with the use of vitamin D in critically ill patients. With reporting of newer RCTs, we conducted this updated meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs comparing vitamin D with placebo in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Eleven RCTs with a total of 2,187 patients (vitamin D: n = 1,120; placebo: n = 1,067) were included. Vitamin D when compared to placebo was associated with the decreased duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD = -0.50; 95% CI = [-0.97, -0.03]; p = 0.04) and ICU stay (SMD = -0.60; 95% CI = [-1.03, -0.16]; p = 0.007) without any difference in the mortality (RR = 0.85; 95% CI = [0.68, 1.04]; p = 0.12) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.21; 95% CI = (-0.51, 0.09); p = 0.18]. Subgroup analysis showed that parenteral vitamin D may reduce the risk of mortality (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = [0.35, 0.83], p = 0.005). Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. Further studies should identify specific groups of patients who will derive the most benefit from vitamin D supplementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.