Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664281›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2022

Sex differences in chronic kidney disease prevalence in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carinna Hockham, Lexia Bao, Anushree Tiku, Sunil V Badve, Aminu K Bello, Meg J Jardine, Vivekanand Jha, Tadashi Toyama, Mark Woodward, Min Jun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Determinants of self-reported chronic disease diagnoses among older persons in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carinna HockhamGeorge Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-5350
Lexia BaoGeorge Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anushree TikuGeorge Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sunil V BadveGeorge Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aminu K BelloDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Meg J JardineNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vivekanand JhaGeorge Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tadashi ToyamaDepartment of Nephrology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-6286
Mark WoodwardGeorge Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Min JunGeorge Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous reports on the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Asia have suggested important sex disparities but have been inconsistent in nature. We sought to synthesize available sex-disaggregated CKD prevalence data in Asia to quantify sex disparities in the region. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase for observational studies involving ≥500 adults who reported sex-disaggregated CKD prevalence data in any of the 26 countries in East, Southeast and South Asia. For each study we calculated the female:male prevalence ratio (PR), with a ratio >1 indicating a higher female prevalence. For each country, log-transformed PRs were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. These were then combined using a fixed effects model, weighting by population size, to estimate a pooled PR for each of East, Southeast and South Asia and Asia overall. Results: Sex-disaggregated data were available from 171 cohorts, spanning 15 countries and comprising 2 550 169 females and 2 595 299 males. Most studies (75.4%) came from East Asia (China, Taiwan, Japan and South Korea). Across Asia, CKD prevalence was higher in females {pooled prevalence 13.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.3-14.9]} compared with males [pooled prevalence 12.1% (95% CI 10.3-14.1)], with a pooled PR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.99-1.17). Substantial heterogeneity was observed between countries. The pooled PRs for East, Southeast and South Asia were 1.11 (95% CI 1.02-1.21), 1.09 (0.88-1.36) and 1.03 (0.87-1.22), respectively. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests considerable between-country and -region heterogeneity in the female:male PR of CKD. However, there remains a large part of the region where data on sex-specific CKD prevalence are absent or limited. Country-level assessment of the differential burden of CKD in females and males is needed to define locally relevant policies that address the needs of both sexes.

Indexed as

albuminuriaCKDepidemiologygendersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35664281
PMCPMC9155252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.