Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664269›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2022

Stopping versus continuing renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors after acute kidney injury and adverse clinical outcomes: an observational study from routine care data.

Roemer J Janse, Edouard L Fu, Catherine M Clase, Laurie Tomlinson, Bengt Lindholm, Merel van Diepen, Friedo W Dekker, Juan-Jesus Carrero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions (ACT): A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Roemer J JanseDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0059-872X
Edouard L FuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-6825
Catherine M ClaseDepartment of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Laurie TomlinsonDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8848-9493
Bengt LindholmDivisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Merel van DiepenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Friedo W DekkerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Juan-Jesus CarreroDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-2024
Leiden University Medical Center · NLKarolinska Institutet · SEImpact · CALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The risk-benefit ratio of continuing with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) after an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI) is unclear. While stopping RASi may prevent recurrent AKI or hyperkalaemia, it may deprive patients of the cardiovascular benefits of using RASi. Methods: We analysed outcomes of long-term RASi users experiencing AKI (stage 2 or 3, or clinically coded) during hospitalization in Stockholm and Sweden during 2007-18. We compared stopping RASi within 3 months after discharge with continuing RASi. The primary study outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Recurrent AKI was our secondary outcome and we considered hyperkalaemia as a positive control outcome. Propensity score overlap weighted Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), balancing 75 confounders. Weighted absolute risk differences (ARDs) were also determined. Results: We included 10 165 individuals, of whom 4429 stopped and 5736 continued RASi, with a median follow-up of 2.3 years. The median age was 78 years; 45% were women and median kidney function before the index episode of AKI was 55 mL/min/1.73 m Discussion: Stopping RASi use among survivors of moderate-to-severe AKI was associated with a similar risk of recurrent AKI, but higher risk of the composite of death, MI and stroke.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsangiotensin receptor antagonistskidney diseasemortality

Identifiers

PMID35664269
PMCPMC9155253
OpenAlexW4206148207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.