Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664264›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2022

Timing of the pre-transplant workup for renal transplantation: is there room for improvement?

Marie Dirix, Ester Philipse, Rowena Vleut, Vera Hartman, Bart Bracke, Thierry Chapelle, Geert Roeyen, Dirk Ysebaert, Gerda Van Beeumen, Erik Snelders and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Time trends in preemptive kidney transplantation in Europe: an ERA registry study.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie DirixDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ester PhilipseDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Rowena VleutDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vera HartmanDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bart BrackeDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thierry ChapelleDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Geert RoeyenDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dirk YsebaertDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gerda Van BeeumenDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Erik SneldersDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Annick MassartDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Katrien LeyssensDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marie M CouttenyeDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Daniel AbramowiczDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Rachel HellemansDepartment of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since patient survival after kidney transplantation is significantly improved with a shorter time on dialysis, it is recommended to start the transplant workup in a timely fashion. Methods: This retrospective study analyses the chronology of actions taken during the care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 who were waitlisted for a first kidney transplant at the Antwerp University Hospital between 2016 and 2019. We aimed to identify risk factors for a delayed start of the transplant workup (i.e. after dialysis initiation) and factors that prolong its duration. Results: Of the 161 patients included, only 43% started the transplant workup before starting dialysis. We identified the number of hospitalization days {odds ratio [OR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.89]; P < 0.001}, language barriers [OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.06-0.61); P = 0.005] and a shorter nephrology follow-up before CKD stage 5 [OR 0.99 (95% CI 1.0-0.98); P = 0.034] as factors having a significant negative impact on the probability of starting the transplant screening before dialysis. The workup took a median of 8.6 months (interquartile range 5-14) to complete. The number of hospitalization days significantly prolonged its duration. Conclusion: The transplant workup was often started too late and the time needed to complete it was surprisingly long. By starting the transplant workup in a timely fashion and reducing the time spent on the screening examinations, we should be able to register patients on the waiting list before or at least at the start of dialysis. We believe that such an internal audit could be of value for every transplant centre.

Indexed as

chronic renal failureCKDdialysisESRDkidney transplantationpre-dialysis

Identifiers

PMID35664264
PMCPMC9155241
OpenAlexW4205648847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.