ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
The Effectiveness of Inquiry and Practice During Project Design Courses at a Technology University.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathways and pitfalls: a qualitative study of student experiences in biomedical science education.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- The relationships among learning engagement, continuous improvement attitude and creativity performance: a study based on a C-STEAM course.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Enhancing adolescents' exercise motivation management with generative AI anthropomorphism: a chain-mediated model of technology acceptance and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Participant observation for inquiry-based learning: a document analysis of exam papers from an internship-course for master's students in health services research in Germany.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Assessing the intention to accept inquiry-based teaching pedagogy among Chinese university students: an extension of technology acceptance model.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Integration of Shangshan culture into the STEAM curriculum and teaching: results of an interview-based study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The effects of art design courses in higher vocational colleges based on C-STEAM.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- A study on the blended learning effects on students majoring in preschool education in the post-pandemic era: An example of a research-method course in a Chinese university.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Professional literacy that Taiwan's bag manufacturing industry talents should possess: Analyzing from a practical perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the many teaching methods, inquiry-based teaching is considered to be an effective way for students to learn and solve problems on their own. However, most of the research related to inquiry-based teaching and learning has concentrated mainly on K-12 education, while few to no studies have focused on the application of inquiry-based teaching and learning in project design courses at university level. Therefore, in order to expand the understanding of the application effect of inquiry-based teaching at university level, this study adopted the quasi-experimental design method, and through the purposive sampling method, 20 students from the Department of Fashion Design at a University of Science and Technology were invited to participate in this study. During the 9-month period, teaching experiments were carried out using two inquiry models, QC/ADEAC and QD/ODEAC. First, when participants were thinking of a creative topic, they followed the process: Question (Q), Collection/Analysis (C/A), Discussion (D), Explanation (E), Amendment (A), and Confirmation (C) in the course. During the production process, the participants were allowed to improve on their work through the process of Question (Q), Doing/Observation (D/O), Discussion (D), Explanation (E), Amendment (A), and Confirmation (C). The teacher became a true guide, so that the participants could explore and work out how to improve their designs through independent inquiry and practice. In this study, questionnaires were administered to participants at five important stages of the design project: "theme development," "color development," "first Work," "second Work," and "third Work." The results of the five surveys showed that the participants' curriculum interest, curriculum value perception, and curriculum confidence in the inquiry program all increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.