Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664027›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2022

Perineal colostomy: advantages and disadvantages.

Francesk Mulita, Konstantinos Tepetes, Georgios-Ioannis Verras, Elias Liolis, Levan Tchabashvili, Charalampos Kaplanis, Ioannis Perdikaris, Dimitrios Velissaris, Ioannis Maroulis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anal Cancer: The Past, Present and Future.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesk MulitaDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Konstantinos TepetesDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Georgios-Ioannis VerrasDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Elias LiolisDepartment of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece.
Levan TchabashviliDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Charalampos KaplanisDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Ioannis PerdikarisDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Dimitrios VelissarisDepartment of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece.
Ioannis MaroulisDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
General University Hospital of Patras · GRUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perineal colostomy is a reconstruction method performed after abdominoperineal resection for rectal malignancy. In this technique, the permanent colostomy is not placed in the left quadrant of the abdomen, but in the perineum. According to the literature, this technique provides many advantages such as a higher degree of satisfaction and greater quality of life to patients. Although this method could be a good option in selected patients, physicians should always be aware of the disadvantages of perineal colostomy.

Indexed as

advantagesperineal colostomyquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35664027
PMCPMC9165335
OpenAlexW3206915758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.