ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2022
Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with non-severe biliary pancreatitis.
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Indication and Timing of Cholecystectomy in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis - Systematic Review.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), cholecystectomy is mandatory to prevent further biliary events, but the precise timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for non-severe disease remain a subject of ongoing debate. Aim: To prove which method - early or delayed LC - is the method of choice in the non-severe disease by examining rates of gallstone-related complications, dissection difficulty, conversion rate, morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Material and methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of patients diagnosed with non-severe ABP, who were followed and underwent LC in our department. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided in to the early (< 2 weeks) and the delayed groups (> 2 weeks). Results: The patients in the early and delayed groups ( Conclusions: Delayed LC increases the rate of biliary events and early LC does not increase the operative difficulty or morbidity in patients with ABP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.