Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664015›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2022

Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the perceptions of empowerment in midwifery practice scale-revised (PEMS-R-IT) in midwives.

Simona Fumagalli, Sara E Borrelli, Giovanni Galeoto, Francescaroberta Panuccio, Chiara Pignataro, Marianna Gottardi, Antonella Nespoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intrapartum Quality of Care among Healthy Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study in an Italian Region.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona FumagalliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Sara E BorrelliDivision of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Giovanni GaleotoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Neuromed - Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Pozzilli, Pozzilli, Italy.
Francescaroberta PanuccioDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Chiara PignataroSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Marianna GottardiSan Daniele del Friuli Ospedale di Sant'Antonio, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, San Daniele, Italy.
Antonella NespoliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA higher degree of midwives' empowerment is associated with greater job satisfaction and better midwifery care outcomes for women and their families. Empowered midwives are able to better empower women who in turn have a positive influence on the midwives' empowerment. The aim of this study was the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the perceptions of empowerment in midwifery scale-revised (PEMS-R) in a group of Italian midwives.

methodsThe World Health Organization (WHO) method was adopted to achieve the PEMS-R Italian version. This process involved five steps: 1) forward translation, 2) expert panel translation, 3) back-translation, 4) pre-testing and cognitive interviewing, and 5) final version. The test's internal consistency and validity were assessed by following international guidelines. Internal consistency was examined through Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient.

resultsThe PEMS-R-IT was administered to 147 Italian midwives from northern Italy. Factor analysis of the 19 items, extracted 4 factors that explained 74.96% of the variance. The Student's t-test for independent samples was used to identify a possible correlation between a higher/lower perception of empowerment and: 1) the education level, and 2) the years of experience of recruited midwives. No statistically significant differences were obtained in either case. The PEMS-R-IT was found to have a good internal consistency for each of its 4 subscales.

conclusionsThe PEMS-R-IT is a valid and reliable tool, useful to assess midwives' empowerment. It can be used in both clinical practice and research in order to investigate the level of empowerment of midwives within the Italian national context.

Indexed as

assessment toolempowermentexploratory factor analysismidwiferypsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID35664015
PMCPMC9126032
OpenAlexW4281398500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.