Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35664010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis Reveals Cellular Functional Heterogeneity in Dermis Between Fibrotic and Regenerative Wound Healing Fates.

Cao-Jie Chen, Hiroki Kajita, Kento Takaya, Noriko Aramaki-Hattori, Shigeki Sakai, Toru Asou, Kazuo Kishi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Role and mechanism of Wnt9a in human and mouse chronic wound healing].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CD201Nature · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cao-Jie ChenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki KajitaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kento TakayaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko Aramaki-HattoriDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeki SakaiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru AsouDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Tokyo Cosmetic Surgery Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuo KishiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fibrotic scars are common in both human and mouse skin wounds. However, wound-induced hair neogenesis in the murine wounding models often results in regenerative repair response. Herein, we aimed to uncover cellular functional heterogeneity in dermis between fibrotic and regenerative wound healing fates. Methods: The expression matrix of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of fibrotic and regenerative wound dermal cells was filtered, normalized, and scaled; underwent principal components analysis; and further analyzed by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) for dimension reduction with the Seurat package. Cell types were annotated, and cell-cell communications were analyzed. The core cell population myofibroblast was identified and the biological functions of ligand and receptor genes between myofibroblast and macrophage were evaluated. Specific genes between fibrotic and regenerative myofibroblast and macrophage were identified. Temporal dynamics of myofibroblast and macrophage were reconstructed with the Monocle tool. Results: Across dermal cells, there were six cell types, namely, EN1-negative myofibroblasts, EN1-positive myofibroblasts, hematopoietic cells, macrophages, pericytes, and endothelial cells. Ligand and receptor genes between myofibroblasts and macrophages mainly modulated cell proliferation and migration, tube development, and the TGF-β pathway. Specific genes that were differentially expressed in fibrotic compared to regenerative myofibroblasts or macrophages were separately identified. Specific genes between fibrotic and regenerative myofibroblasts were involved in the mRNA metabolic process and organelle organization. Specific genes between fibrotic and regenerative macrophages participated in regulating immunity and phagocytosis. We then observed the underlying evolution of myofibroblasts or macrophages. Conclusion: Collectively, our findings reveal that myofibroblasts and macrophages may alter the skin wound healing fate through modulating critical signaling pathways.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsWound HealingAnimalsDermisFibrosisLigandsMiceSequence Analysis, RNALigandsfibrosismacrophagemyofibroblastregenerationsingle-cell RNA sequencingskin wound healing

Identifiers

PMID35664010
PMCPMC9156976
OpenAlexW4280620341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.