ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis Reveals Cellular Functional Heterogeneity in Dermis Between Fibrotic and Regenerative Wound Healing Fates.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Mutation-Derived and Expression Features from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing: Pitfalls of Standard Cross-Validation in Small-Cohort Settings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Targeting circulating mechanoresponsive monocytes and macrophages to reduce fibrosis.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- [Role and mechanism of Wnt9a in human and mouse chronic wound healing].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Microbial allies in skin trauma recovery: from immune modulation to engineered probiotic therapeutics.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- A skin-interfaced three-dimensional closed-loop sensing and therapeutic electronic wound bandage.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic characterization of transitioning cell types in the skin of Atlantic salmon.BMC biology · 2025Article
- RNA-sequencing demonstrates transcriptional differences between human vocal fold fibroblasts and myofibroblasts.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Exploring machine learning strategies for single-cell transcriptomic analysis in wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Angiogenesis during diabetic wound repair: from mechanism to therapy opportunity.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Temporal dynamics of macrophage transcriptional profiles during zebrafish wound healing.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Acute contact with profibrotic macrophages mechanically activates fibroblasts via αvβ3 integrin-mediated engagement of Piezo1.Science advances · 2024Article
- CD9 promotes TβR2-TβR1 association driving the transition of human dermal fibroblasts to myofibroblast under hypoxia.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Advances and applications of biomimetic biomaterials for endogenous skin regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Plasma membrane damage limits replicative lifespan in yeast and induces premature senescence in human fibroblasts.Nature aging · 2024Article
- Macrophage-based therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular diseases.Basic research in cardiology · 2024Review
- Fibroblast heterogeneity and functions: insights from single-cell sequencing in wound healing, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and melanoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Single-cell sequencing technology in skin wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2024Review
- Comparative analysis of human and mouse transcriptomes during skin wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Article
- CD201Nature · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibrotic scars are common in both human and mouse skin wounds. However, wound-induced hair neogenesis in the murine wounding models often results in regenerative repair response. Herein, we aimed to uncover cellular functional heterogeneity in dermis between fibrotic and regenerative wound healing fates. Methods: The expression matrix of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of fibrotic and regenerative wound dermal cells was filtered, normalized, and scaled; underwent principal components analysis; and further analyzed by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) for dimension reduction with the Seurat package. Cell types were annotated, and cell-cell communications were analyzed. The core cell population myofibroblast was identified and the biological functions of ligand and receptor genes between myofibroblast and macrophage were evaluated. Specific genes between fibrotic and regenerative myofibroblast and macrophage were identified. Temporal dynamics of myofibroblast and macrophage were reconstructed with the Monocle tool. Results: Across dermal cells, there were six cell types, namely, EN1-negative myofibroblasts, EN1-positive myofibroblasts, hematopoietic cells, macrophages, pericytes, and endothelial cells. Ligand and receptor genes between myofibroblasts and macrophages mainly modulated cell proliferation and migration, tube development, and the TGF-β pathway. Specific genes that were differentially expressed in fibrotic compared to regenerative myofibroblasts or macrophages were separately identified. Specific genes between fibrotic and regenerative myofibroblasts were involved in the mRNA metabolic process and organelle organization. Specific genes between fibrotic and regenerative macrophages participated in regulating immunity and phagocytosis. We then observed the underlying evolution of myofibroblasts or macrophages. Conclusion: Collectively, our findings reveal that myofibroblasts and macrophages may alter the skin wound healing fate through modulating critical signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.