ArticleRadiology case reports2022
Magnetic resonance imaging pitfalls in determining myometrial invasion in stage I endometrial cancer: A case report and literature review.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Working in concert: radiology, pathology, and gynecologic oncology applications of the 2023 FIGO updates in endometrial cancer staging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Contrast-enhanced MRI and CT in evaluating treatment response for recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective case-control study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Five-year disease-free survival in FIGO IA stage endometrial cancer patients: Tertiary institution experience in a developing country.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The degree of myometrial invasion (MI) is crucial in the preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) using MRI in terms of therapeutic and prognostic implications. However, several pitfalls should be kept in mind when using this modality. We report a case of EC on a 64-year-old woman, identified preoperatively without MI based on ultrasonography and MRI, implying a low risk of lymph node metastasis; surprisingly, the uterine incision showed the lesion had invaded <50% of the myometrium. Thus, a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed, and histopathologic analysis confirmed that the EC was on stage IA (cancer is in the endometrium only or less than halfway through the myometrium). In our case, thinning myometrium and uterine atrophy due to aging, multiple leiomyomas, previous curettage, and blood clots were all pitfalls for MRI in detecting MI. By detecting tiny or isointense tumors and depicting distinct vascularity of the malignancy in postmenopausal women, functional MRI techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) can help reduce pitfalls when assessing MI. Clinicians can employ DWI preoperatively, which is more reliable and superior to DCE-MRI in determining tumor areas without contrast injection and perform a postoperative histopathological examination to confirm MI in EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.