ArticleCureus2022
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Sectioning of the Filum Terminale for Treatment of Tethered Cord Syndrome Associated With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-occurrence of tethered cord syndrome and cervical spine instability in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Neuraxial biomechanics, fluid dynamics, and myodural regulation: rethinking management of hypermobility and CNS disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Comorbidities and neurosurgical interventions in a cohort with connective tissue disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) was first reported as a potential complication of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome in 2009. However, there have been few publications on the subject since that time, and optimal treatment of TCS in the setting of the hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) population remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of surgical release of the filum terminale (FT) for the treatment of TCS in this patient population. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive hEDS patients with TCS who were treated with surgical release after providing informed surgical consent over a 4.5-year period by a single neurosurgeon. Eighty-four patients were identified and asked to complete surveys with items regarding pre and postoperative symptoms, pain levels, and satisfaction. Results Thirty patients with a mean age of 30.8 ± 11.9 years, all female, were included. Low back pain was significantly improved across the entire cohort. For patients with both pre and postoperative data available, the distance they were able to walk also improved significantly. The majority of patients were "highly satisfied" with surgery (66%), followed by 21% "satisfied", 10% "neutral", and one patient who was "dissatisfied". One patient required repair of a dural leak one week postoperatively, and no other complications were noted. Conclusions Surgical release of the FT for TCS in patients with hEDS was safe and effective in this cohort. For most patients, there was a significant improvement in low back pain, urinary symptoms, and ability to ambulate distance. The majority of respondents reported subjective satisfaction with this operation. A further prospective study is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.