ArticleCureus2022
A Case of the Use of Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in a Patient With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection marked by increased fluid diffusely in alveolar spaces. The management of ARDS can be complicated by mechanical hyperinflation, and thus a mainstay of treatment has included low tidal volume mechanical ventilation. This, however, can lead to ventilation-associated hypercapnia, which may result in respiratory acidosis. COVID-19-associated ARDS (CARDs) has been described in the literature, and guidelines tend to mimic ARDS management. However, the heterogeneous nature of COVID-19 pulmonary disease with respect to dead space, compliance, and shunting could alter guidelines. As low tidal volume remains a cornerstone in CARDS management, hypercapnic acidosis remains a risk. An emerging technology, extracorporeal CO2 removal devices (ECCO2R), has been granted emergency use authorization by the FDA for the management of CARDS. We present a 44-year-old male patient presenting positive for COVID-19. Following admission, the patient's oxygen status continually deteriorated and the patient went into acute respiratory distress, eventually requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. The patient became hypercapnic and acidotic due to low tidal volume ventilation. ECCO2R was used to manage the patient's hypercapnia, resulting in significant amelioration of his partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) and pH. The patient was eventually transferred to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) certified facility and survived after a prolonged hospital and rehabilitation course. In the management of CARDS patients who require mechanical respiration, there are many unanswered questions as to the appropriate ventilation strategy. Current practice recommends low tidal volume ventilation, carrying, and increased risk of hypercapnic respiratory acidosis as occurred in our patient. We believe that ECCO2R may be an appropriate bridge between low tidal volume ventilation and ECMO to stabilize acid-base disturbances in ventilated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.