Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663613›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2022

The validation of the existence of the entero-mammary pathway and the assessment of the differences of the pathway between first and third parity sows.

Laura L Greiner, Dalton C Humphrey, Shayla N Holland, C J Anderson, Stephan Schmitz-Esser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of a Feed Sanitizer in Sow Diets on Sow and Piglet Performance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Aerobic Vaginal Microflora in Gestational and Non-Gestational Bitches (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Determinants of microbial colonization in the premature gut.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura L GreinerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-009X
Dalton C HumphreyDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Shayla N HollandDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
C J AndersonDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Stephan Schmitz-EsserDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-0709
Iowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forty sows (PIC Camborough 1050) from a single farm were randomly selected at 112 days of gestation to evaluate if gut bacteria transverse the blood system of the sow to deposit gut microbiota into the colostrum for piglet gut inoculation via the entero-mammary pathway. Fourteen first-parity gilts and 20 third-parity sows were used for the study. At the time of farrowing, colostrum, fecal samples, and blood samples were collected to evaluate the presence of bacteria in each sample. Colostrum and blood samples were processed via centrifugation to separate the immune cell fraction. Total DNA was extracted from fecal, colostrum, and white blood cell fractions. 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing was conducted at the Iowa State University DNA Facility (Ames, IA) to further characterize the bacterial and archaeal taxa present within each sample. Data were analyzed using Mothur and using R v4.0.3 (R Core Team, 2020). The experimental unit was the sow. Tables were generated to demonstrate the relative abundances of bacteria and archaea present in each type of sample and also identify organisms differentially abundant between sample types.

Indexed as

bacteriaentero-mammarymicrobiotaswine

Identifiers

PMID35663613
PMCPMC9154326
OpenAlexW4224291478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.