ArticleIDCases2022
Brucellosis presenting with sepsis and cholestasis: A rare presentation of an endemic disease with review of the literature.
Article in IDCases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease endemic to the Middle East and Mediterranean basin. It has gained diagnostic challenge recently due to its increasingly non-specific and vague manifestations at presentation. Here, we report a 53-year-old man presenting with undulating fever and shaking chills and frequency, dysuria, hesitancy and malodorous urine. He had prior complicated urinary tract infection treated with intravenous antibiotics. Further evaluation revealed negative urine culture, intra-hepatic cholestasis due to underlying infection, elevated acute phase reactants and pancytopenia.The diagnosis of brucella was established as blood cultures grew Brucella melitensis and serum serology for Brucellosis returned positive. Following initiation of anti- brucella drugs, fever and laboratory abnormalities gradually returned to normal. Brucellosis should be always considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with sepsis in endemic regions or when empiric antibiotic therapy fails to improve clinical and laboratory abnormalities. Diagnosis requires high level of suspicious based on the clinical history and constellation of symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.