Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35663573›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Interleaved Pro/Anti-saccade Behavior Across the Lifespan.

Rachel Yep, Matthew L Smorenburg, Heidi C Riek, Olivia G Calancie, Ryan H Kirkpatrick, Julia E Perkins, Jeff Huang, Brian C Coe, Donald C Brien, Douglas P Munoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel YepCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Matthew L SmorenburgCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Heidi C RiekCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Olivia G CalancieCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Ryan H KirkpatrickCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Julia E PerkinsCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Jeff HuangCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Brian C CoeCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Donald C BrienCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Douglas P MunozCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity for inhibitory control is an important cognitive process that undergoes dynamic changes over the course of the lifespan. Robust characterization of this trajectory, considering age continuously and using flexible modeling techniques, is critical to advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms that differ in healthy aging and neurological disease. The interleaved pro/anti-saccade task (IPAST), in which pro- and anti-saccade trials are randomly interleaved within a block, provides a simple and sensitive means of assessing the neural circuitry underlying inhibitory control. We utilized IPAST data collected from a large cross-sectional cohort of normative participants (

Indexed as

anti-saccadechange point analysisinhibitory controlinterleavedlifespan

Identifiers

PMID35663573
PMCPMC9159803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.